You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/27 16:46:52 UTC
[Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Hi Devs,
I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release artifacts at
[1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The key used
to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache Axis2/C
1.3.0 release.
I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
Thanks,
Dinesh
1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
--
http://nethu.org/
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
We have kept vote open for more than 72 hours and we did not get
any -1. We have 8, +1's including 3 PMC votes.
Summary
-------
Dinesh Premalal (WSPMC)
Samisa Abesinghe (WSPMC)
Damitha Kumarage (WSPMC)
Dushshantha Chandradasa
Manjula Peiris
Milinda Pathirage
Senaka Fernando
Bill Mitchell
I will close the vote and proceed with the release.
thanks,
Dinesh
--
http://nethu.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
RE: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Bill Mitchell <bm...@austin.rr.com>.
In addition to the release Windows binary (libxml2), I built the Windows source using libcurl and guththila, and it worked fine.
Here is my +1.
Thanks,
Bill Mitchell
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
> artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be
> found at [2].
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
>
> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@wso2.com>.
Tested both source and binary on Windows. Looks good.
Here is my +1.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
> artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be
> found at [2].
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
>
> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date: 2/26/2008 7:50 PM
>
--
Samisa Abeysinghe
Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
email: samisa@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 753 7913
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Damitha Kumarage <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dinesh,
I have tested following scenarios,
- All samples
- Sandesha2/C
-Savan/C
with Guththila/libxml2 in Linux platform. Seems to be OK for me.
Here is my +1
thanks
Damitha
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
> artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be
> found at [2].
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
>
> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>.
Hi Bill,
Well there was this request in making Guththila the default parser but it
seems that it never became accepted by most devs. However, the concern was
in making it default after 1.3.0, which is possible.
Regards,
Senaka
> Bill Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no
>> guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with
>> libxml2 as the parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I
>> donât think there is any reason guththila canât be the default
>> parser. Even though this was raised as a suggestion a month ago, my
>> guess is that no one remembered, after all the issues were fixed, to
>> go ahead and change over the default.
>>
>
> Even though there was discussion on making Guththila the default parser,
> there was no decision made on this to make it the default as far as I
> know.
>>
>>
>>
>> Itâs probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring
>> it to your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development
>> cycle, guththila actually received more use and testing than did the
>> libxml interface.
>>
>
> I doubt, because it was never made the default parser. So I did always
> test with libxml. I am sure bulk of the other devs too used libxml.
> Specially the dependent projects like Rampart and Sandesha need to test
> Guththila in full, before making it the default parser, and I to my
> knowledge, those has not been tested. I still use them with the libxml
> parser.
>
> Samisa...
>
>>
>>
>> Bill Mitchell
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Dinesh Premalal [mailto:xydinesh@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:47 AM
>> *To:* Apache AXIS C Developers List
>> *Subject:* [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
>> artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be
>> found at [2].
>>
>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
>> Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
>>
>> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dinesh
>>
>> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://nethu.org/
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date:
>> 2/26/2008 7:50 PM
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@wso2.com>.
Bill Mitchell wrote:
>
> Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no
> guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with
> libxml2 as the parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I
> don’t think there is any reason guththila can’t be the default
> parser. Even though this was raised as a suggestion a month ago, my
> guess is that no one remembered, after all the issues were fixed, to
> go ahead and change over the default.
>
Even though there was discussion on making Guththila the default parser,
there was no decision made on this to make it the default as far as I know.
>
>
>
> It’s probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring
> it to your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development
> cycle, guththila actually received more use and testing than did the
> libxml interface.
>
I doubt, because it was never made the default parser. So I did always
test with libxml. I am sure bulk of the other devs too used libxml.
Specially the dependent projects like Rampart and Sandesha need to test
Guththila in full, before making it the default parser, and I to my
knowledge, those has not been tested. I still use them with the libxml
parser.
Samisa...
>
>
> Bill Mitchell
>
>
>
> *From:* Dinesh Premalal [mailto:xydinesh@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:47 AM
> *To:* Apache AXIS C Developers List
> *Subject:* [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
>
>
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
> artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be
> found at [2].
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
>
> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date: 2/26/2008 7:50 PM
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2]Making Guththila default parser (Re:
[Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts)
Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>.
> Bill,
>
> "Bill Mitchell" <bm...@austin.rr.com> writes:
>
>> Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no
>> guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with libxml2
>> as the
>> parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I donât think
>> there is
>> any reason guththila canât be the default parser. Even though this
>> was raised
>> as a suggestion a month ago, my guess is that no one remembered, after
>> all the
>> issues were fixed, to go ahead and change over the default.Â
>
> I guess what we had was a discussion regarding make guththila default
> parser, and no decisions made regarding that. Although all the issues
> were fixed, lets give sometime to module implementers to play with
> Guththila as the default parser.
>
>> Itâs probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring
>> it to
>> your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development cycle,
>> guththila
>> actually received more use and testing than did the libxml
>> interface.
> Even though it was well tested with Axis2/C scenarios , I think
> guththila is still didn't test much with other modules (like
> Rampart/C, Sandesha/C, Savan/C etc). I would suggest to move forward
> with making Guththila default parser after having feedback from other
> module developers.
+1,
Regards,
Senaka
>
> thanks,
> Dinesh
> --
> http://nethu.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[Axis2]Making Guththila default parser (Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts)
Posted by Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>.
Bill,
"Bill Mitchell" <bm...@austin.rr.com> writes:
> Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no
> guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with libxml2 as the
> parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I don’t think there is
> any reason guththila can’t be the default parser. Even though this was raised
> as a suggestion a month ago, my guess is that no one remembered, after all the
> issues were fixed, to go ahead and change over the default.
I guess what we had was a discussion regarding make guththila default
parser, and no decisions made regarding that. Although all the issues
were fixed, lets give sometime to module implementers to play with
Guththila as the default parser.
> It’s probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring it to
> your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development cycle, guththila
> actually received more use and testing than did the libxml
> interface.
Even though it was well tested with Axis2/C scenarios , I think
guththila is still didn't test much with other modules (like
Rampart/C, Sandesha/C, Savan/C etc). I would suggest to move forward
with making Guththila default parser after having feedback from other
module developers.
thanks,
Dinesh
--
http://nethu.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
RE: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Bill Mitchell <bm...@austin.rr.com>.
Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with libxml2 as the parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I don’t think there is any reason guththila can’t be the default parser. Even though this was raised as a suggestion a month ago, my guess is that no one remembered, after all the issues were fixed, to go ahead and change over the default.
It’s probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development cycle, guththila actually received more use and testing than did the libxml interface.
Bill Mitchell
From: Dinesh Premalal [mailto:xydinesh@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List
Subject: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Hi Devs,
I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release artifacts at [1]. The key used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release.
I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
Thanks,
Dinesh
1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
--
http://nethu.org/
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Manjula Peiris <ma...@wso2.com>.
I have tested both source and binary packages on linux. works fine and
here is my +1.
-Manjula.
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:47 +0530, Senaka Fernando wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tested the Linux Binary. Works fine. Few concerns regarding docs.
>
> 1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same in
> content?)
>
> 2. Typo in NEWS.
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using both HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
> DELETE> should be modified as
>
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and DELETE>
>
> the word 'both' must be removed.
>
> 3. Wont we pack with Changelog (when it comes to a Binary)
>
> 4. .svn folder found inside docs directory
>
> 5. There is a folder called share (inside it I see the TCPMon README and
> some docs), what is this all about?
>
> 6. wrong NEWS message in samples/NEWS (not updated since 1.0.0 ?)
>
> 7. Need to update samples/ChangeLog, samples/AUTHORS, samples/COPYING, and
> need to add samples/LICENSE
>
> 8. dependencies.html not modified. We do depend on stuff other than ours
> only, at least for various add-ons like codegen, and ssl client
>
> 9. README inside docs must be removed (this is only for svn users)
>
> 10. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are we
> adding this online?
>
> Regards,
> Senaka
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
> > agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dushshantha
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Devs,
> >>
> >> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
> >> artifacts
> >> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The
> >> key
> >> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
> >>
> >> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> >> Axis2/C
> >> 1.3.0 release.
> >>
> >> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dinesh
> >>
> >> 1.
> >> http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> >> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://nethu.org/
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>.
Hi All,
I have attached a diff of modifications. However, still a few issues exist
which I can't decide on my own on what should be done. I think Dinesh you
got to decide these.
1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same in
content?)
2. need to add samples/LICENSE
3. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are we
adding this online?
All other issues will be solved by this diff.
> Hi All,
>
> Tested the Linux Binary. Works fine. Few concerns regarding docs.
>
> 1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same in
> content?)
>
> 2. Typo in NEWS.
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using both HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
> DELETE> should be modified as
>
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
> DELETE>
>
> the word 'both' must be removed.
>
> 3. Wont we pack with Changelog (when it comes to a Binary)
>
> 4. .svn folder found inside docs directory
>
> 5. There is a folder called share (inside it I see the TCPMon README and
> some docs), what is this all about?
>
> 6. wrong NEWS message in samples/NEWS (not updated since 1.0.0 ?)
>
> 7. Need to update samples/ChangeLog, samples/AUTHORS, samples/COPYING, and
> need to add samples/LICENSE
>
> 8. dependencies.html not modified. We do depend on stuff other than ours
> only, at least for various add-ons like codegen, and ssl client
>
> 9. README inside docs must be removed (this is only for svn users)
>
> 10. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are we
> adding this online?
>
> Regards,
> Senaka
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
>> agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dushshantha
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
>>> artifacts
>>> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The
>>> key
>>> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
>>>
>>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
>>> Axis2/C
>>> 1.3.0 release.
>>>
>>> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dinesh
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
>>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://nethu.org/
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Issues in 1.3.0 Release Artifacts (Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C
1.3.0 Release Artifacts)
Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>.
Hi Dinesh,
Raised an issue on this. Therefore, +1 for the Linux Binary artifact.
Tested on Ubuntu 7.04, and Ubuntu 7.10.
Regards,
Senaka
> Hi Senaka,
>
> I'm glad that you report those issues. Really appreciate good
> testing. However those issues seems to be related to docs and lets
> fix them after 1.3.0 release. Please raise jira issues , just to make
> sure that they will not forget.
>
> One more thing, There are some minor problems regarding those docs
> (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS etc) in axiom, util, guththila and neethi
> sub projects.
>
> thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> "Senaka Fernando" <se...@wso2.com> writes:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Tested the Linux Binary. Works fine. Few concerns regarding docs.
>>
>> 1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same
>> in
>> content?)
>>
>> 2. Typo in NEWS.
>> <17. REST support (more POX like) using both HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT
>> and
>> DELETE> should be modified as
>>
>> <17. REST support (more POX like) using HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
>> DELETE>
>>
>> the word 'both' must be removed.
>>
>> 3. Wont we pack with Changelog (when it comes to a Binary)
>>
>> 4. .svn folder found inside docs directory
>>
>> 5. There is a folder called share (inside it I see the TCPMon README and
>> some docs), what is this all about?
>>
>> 6. wrong NEWS message in samples/NEWS (not updated since 1.0.0 ?)
>>
>> 7. Need to update samples/ChangeLog, samples/AUTHORS, samples/COPYING,
>> and
>> need to add samples/LICENSE
>>
>> 8. dependencies.html not modified. We do depend on stuff other than ours
>> only, at least for various add-ons like codegen, and ssl client
>>
>> 9. README inside docs must be removed (this is only for svn users)
>>
>> 10. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are
>> we
>> adding this online?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Senaka
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
>>> agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dushshantha
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Devs,
>>>>
>>>> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
>>>> artifacts
>>>> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The
>>>> key
>>>> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
>>>>
>>>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
>>>> Axis2/C
>>>> 1.3.0 release.
>>>>
>>>> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dinesh
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
>>>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://nethu.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Issues in 1.3.0 Release Artifacts (Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts)
Posted by Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>.
Hi Senaka,
I'm glad that you report those issues. Really appreciate good
testing. However those issues seems to be related to docs and lets
fix them after 1.3.0 release. Please raise jira issues , just to make
sure that they will not forget.
One more thing, There are some minor problems regarding those docs
(AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS etc) in axiom, util, guththila and neethi
sub projects.
thanks,
Dinesh
"Senaka Fernando" <se...@wso2.com> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Tested the Linux Binary. Works fine. Few concerns regarding docs.
>
> 1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same in
> content?)
>
> 2. Typo in NEWS.
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using both HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
> DELETE> should be modified as
>
> <17. REST support (more POX like) using HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and DELETE>
>
> the word 'both' must be removed.
>
> 3. Wont we pack with Changelog (when it comes to a Binary)
>
> 4. .svn folder found inside docs directory
>
> 5. There is a folder called share (inside it I see the TCPMon README and
> some docs), what is this all about?
>
> 6. wrong NEWS message in samples/NEWS (not updated since 1.0.0 ?)
>
> 7. Need to update samples/ChangeLog, samples/AUTHORS, samples/COPYING, and
> need to add samples/LICENSE
>
> 8. dependencies.html not modified. We do depend on stuff other than ours
> only, at least for various add-ons like codegen, and ssl client
>
> 9. README inside docs must be removed (this is only for svn users)
>
> 10. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are we
> adding this online?
>
> Regards,
> Senaka
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
>> agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dushshantha
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
>>> artifacts
>>> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The
>>> key
>>> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
>>>
>>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
>>> Axis2/C
>>> 1.3.0 release.
>>>
>>> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dinesh
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
>>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://nethu.org/
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
--
http://nethu.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>.
Hi All,
Tested the Linux Binary. Works fine. Few concerns regarding docs.
1. COPYING has more content than LICENSE (shouldn't the two be the same in
content?)
2. Typo in NEWS.
<17. REST support (more POX like) using both HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and
DELETE> should be modified as
<17. REST support (more POX like) using HTTP POST, GET, HEAD, PUT and DELETE>
the word 'both' must be removed.
3. Wont we pack with Changelog (when it comes to a Binary)
4. .svn folder found inside docs directory
5. There is a folder called share (inside it I see the TCPMon README and
some docs), what is this all about?
6. wrong NEWS message in samples/NEWS (not updated since 1.0.0 ?)
7. Need to update samples/ChangeLog, samples/AUTHORS, samples/COPYING, and
need to add samples/LICENSE
8. dependencies.html not modified. We do depend on stuff other than ours
only, at least for various add-ons like codegen, and ssl client
9. README inside docs must be removed (this is only for svn users)
10. /docs/mail-lists.html has the CVS Commit Message mailing list. Are we
adding this online?
Regards,
Senaka
> Hi All,
>
> I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
> agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Dushshantha
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release
>> artifacts
>> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The
>> key
>> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
>>
>> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
>> Axis2/C
>> 1.3.0 release.
>>
>> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dinesh
>>
>> 1.
>> http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://nethu.org/
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Vote][Axis2]Axis2/C 1.3.0 Release Artifacts
Posted by Dushshantha Chandradasa <du...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
I tested Windows Binary and Source. It works fine except the issues we
agreed to fix after 1.3.0.
Here's my +1
Regards,
Dushshantha
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I have packaged and uploaded the Apache Axis2/C 1.3.0 release artifacts
> at [1]. <http://people.apache.org/%7Esamisa/release/1.0.0/final/> The key
> used to sign the release artifacts can be found at [2].
>
> Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache Axis2/C
> 1.3.0 release.
>
> I have tested and reviewed them and here is my vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~dinesh/release/1.3.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edinesh/release/1.3.0/>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis2/c/KEYS
>
>
> --
> http://nethu.org/