You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by jm...@apache.org on 2006/11/07 16:01:50 UTC
svn commit: r472129 - /spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf
Author: jm
Date: Tue Nov 7 07:01:49 2006
New Revision: 472129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=472129
Log:
add comment speculating about T_RCVD_IN_XBL
Modified:
spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf
Modified: spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf?view=diff&rev=472129&r1=472128&r2=472129
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf Tue Nov 7 07:01:49 2006
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
### see how checking only the -firsttrusted host affects hit rates of various DNSBLs ###
+# jm: what bug# is this? in my opinion T_RCVD_IN_XBL indicates that we
+# should split RCVD_IN_XBL into a firsttrusted and a not-firsttrusted
+# variant, it gets good hits.
header T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL eval:check_rbl('njabl-firsttrusted', 'combined.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3')
describe T_RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP