You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@etch.apache.org by James Dixson <di...@gmail.com> on 2009/02/09 00:01:37 UTC
[vote] Release 1.0.2
Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
top-level directory to reduce clutter.
The candidate files can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
--
james
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
Nod. I had all of the files in one directory and signed them all at once...
On 2/9/09 10:39 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> i'm thinking rat output doesn't need to be signed. just saying...
>
> James Dixson wrote:
>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>
>> The candidate files can be found here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>
>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>
>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>
>> --
>> james
>>
>
--
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
i'm thinking rat output doesn't need to be signed. just saying...
James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>
> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>
> --
> james
>
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
I will add it.
On 2/9/09 11:01 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> NOTICE.txt not copied to install image, either.
>
> James Dixson wrote:
>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>
>> The candidate files can be found here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>
>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>
>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>
>> --
>> james
>>
>
--
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
NOTICE.txt not copied to install image, either.
James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>
> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>
> --
> james
>
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
Just following the conventions described in:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
On 2/9/09 10:38 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> shouldn't the files with pgp sigs be named .pgp instead of .asc?
>
> James Dixson wrote:
>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>
>> The candidate files can be found here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>
>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>
> Each file should have an MD5, SHA1 and a *PGP *Signature.
>
>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>
>> --
>> james
>>
--
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
shouldn't the files with pgp sigs be named .pgp instead of .asc?
James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>
Each file should have an MD5, SHA1 and a *PGP *Signature.
> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>
> --
> james
>
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
Ok. I will update the READMEs and add the missing .txt files and respin.
On 2/9/09 11:22 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> inline.
>
> James Dixson wrote:
>>
>> On 2/9/09 10:56 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> the README.txt has problems:
>>>
>>> 1) the eclipse howto is gone.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> There is no Eclipse howto for using Etch, only an Eclipse howto for building
>> the Etch source. That content was moved to BUILD.txt an is part of the
>> source distribution.
>>
> roger.
>>
>>> 2) the top level directory structure is:
>>>
>>> ChangeLog.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt bin examples lib maven
>>> uninst.exe
>>>
>>>
>>
>> For the windows binary install, yes it is. Is there a problem?
>>
> NOTICE.txt is missing. ReleaseNotes.txt is missing. uninst.exe is not
> listed. examples is not listed.
>>
>>> 3) the release notes are gone.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> They exist in the source distribution but not in the binary distro. I will
>> add them to the binary and respin.
>>
>>
>>> 4) the path for ETCH_HOME is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Do you mean the one set by the windows installer? It is setting ETCH_HOME to
>> the installation path as it should.
>>
> most of these problems were about the readme. the path as documented in
> the readme is wrong.
>>
>>
>>> 5) the etch installer name is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> How is it wrong. "Apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating-setup.exe" is what it is.
>>
> in the readme it is wrong.
>>
>>
>>> 6) Welcome to the 1.0.2 release of (Apache) Etch.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What does this mean?
>>
> in the readme it is wrong.
>>
>>> 7) we discussed renaming the c# binding dll to Etch-Csharp.dll but this
>>> hasn't been done.
>>>
>>
>> Out of band conversation.. Not on 'etch-dev'. I agree it should be renamed
>> but not for 1.0.2.
>>
> not so sure about that but ok for now.
>>
>>> scott out
>>>
>>> James Dixson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>>>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>>>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>>>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>>>
>>>> The candidate files can be found here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>>>
>>>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>>>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>>>
>>>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>>>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> james
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
--
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
inline.
James Dixson wrote:
>
> On 2/9/09 10:56 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
>> the README.txt has problems:
>>
>> 1) the eclipse howto is gone.
>>
>>
>
> There is no Eclipse howto for using Etch, only an Eclipse howto for building
> the Etch source. That content was moved to BUILD.txt an is part of the
> source distribution.
>
roger.
>
>> 2) the top level directory structure is:
>>
>> ChangeLog.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt bin examples lib maven
>> uninst.exe
>>
>>
>
> For the windows binary install, yes it is. Is there a problem?
>
NOTICE.txt is missing. ReleaseNotes.txt is missing. uninst.exe is not
listed. examples is not listed.
>
>> 3) the release notes are gone.
>>
>>
>
> They exist in the source distribution but not in the binary distro. I will
> add them to the binary and respin.
>
>
>> 4) the path for ETCH_HOME is wrong.
>>
>>
>
> Do you mean the one set by the windows installer? It is setting ETCH_HOME to
> the installation path as it should.
>
most of these problems were about the readme. the path as documented in
the readme is wrong.
>
>
>> 5) the etch installer name is wrong.
>>
>>
>
> How is it wrong. "Apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating-setup.exe" is what it is.
>
in the readme it is wrong.
>
>
>> 6) Welcome to the 1.0.2 release of (Apache) Etch.
>>
>>
>
> What does this mean?
>
in the readme it is wrong.
>
>> 7) we discussed renaming the c# binding dll to Etch-Csharp.dll but this
>> hasn't been done.
>>
>
> Out of band conversation.. Not on 'etch-dev'. I agree it should be renamed
> but not for 1.0.2.
>
not so sure about that but ok for now.
>
>> scott out
>>
>> James Dixson wrote:
>>
>>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>>
>>> The candidate files can be found here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>>
>>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>>
>>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>>
>>> --
>>> james
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
On 2/9/09 10:56 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> the README.txt has problems:
>
> 1) the eclipse howto is gone.
>
There is no Eclipse howto for using Etch, only an Eclipse howto for building
the Etch source. That content was moved to BUILD.txt an is part of the
source distribution.
> 2) the top level directory structure is:
>
> ChangeLog.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt bin examples lib maven
> uninst.exe
>
For the windows binary install, yes it is. Is there a problem?
> 3) the release notes are gone.
>
They exist in the source distribution but not in the binary distro. I will
add them to the binary and respin.
> 4) the path for ETCH_HOME is wrong.
>
Do you mean the one set by the windows installer? It is setting ETCH_HOME to
the installation path as it should.
> 5) the etch installer name is wrong.
>
How is it wrong. "Apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating-setup.exe" is what it is.
> 6) Welcome to the 1.0.2 release of (Apache) Etch.
>
What does this mean?
> 7) we discussed renaming the c# binding dll to Etch-Csharp.dll but this
> hasn't been done.
Out of band conversation.. Not on 'etch-dev'. I agree it should be renamed
but not for 1.0.2.
>
> scott out
>
> James Dixson wrote:
>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>
>> The candidate files can be found here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>
>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>
>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>
>> --
>> james
>>
>
--
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
the README.txt has problems:
1) the eclipse howto is gone.
2) the top level directory structure is:
ChangeLog.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt bin examples lib maven
uninst.exe
3) the release notes are gone.
4) the path for ETCH_HOME is wrong.
5) the etch installer name is wrong.
6) Welcome to the 1.0.2 release of (Apache) Etch.
7) we discussed renaming the c# binding dll to Etch-Csharp.dll but this
hasn't been done.
scott out
James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>
> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>
> --
> james
>
Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Posted by scott comer <sc...@cisco.com>.
i just wanna say thanks, james, for the monumental effort of cleaning up
the release. you're
a peach!
http://www.bcareachamber.com/14.phtml.html
<http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bcareachamber.com/sbimages/peach4.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bcareachamber.com/14.phtml.html&h=395&w=400&sz=28&tbnid=hLDqeTbWLBl1BM::&tbnh=122&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpeach%2Bimage&usg=__uxSme4crIspqFJLsf7Im4hEMA18=&ei=2WmQSYnNHoKOsQOphPz-CA&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=1&ct=image&cd=1>
scott out
James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>
> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>
> --
> james
>