You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by "ljairath@uoguelph.ca" <lk...@yahoo.com> on 2007/12/08 05:59:09 UTC

discrepancy for tomcat connector file names for win32

Hi,

Is there a discrepancy at this URL 
    http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-1.2.25/
for downloading the binaries for win32. Please, see below the name of the files and the description at the bottom.

Thx.
Lalit
 mod_jk-apache-2.0.29.so                           07-Aug-2007 10:33  192K  shared object file
 mod_jk-apache-2.0.29.so.asc                       07-Aug-2007 10:54  185   OpenPGP ASCII armored signature
 mod_jk-apache-2.0.29.so.md5                       07-Aug-2007 10:54   58   MD5 checksum file
 mod_jk-apache-2.0.29.so.sha1                      07-Aug-2007 10:54   66   SHA1 checksum file
 mod_jk-apache-2.0.29.so.sha256                    07-Aug-2007 10:54   90   SHA256 checksum file

Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.25 for WIN32


Here you'll find the binaries for IIS, Apache and Sun ONE Web Servers.





mod_jk-apache-1.3.37.so is for Apache 1.3, and works with Apache 1.3.37 and later.
Rename to mod_jk.so before putting it in your 
Apache2/modules directory.

mod_jk-apache-2.0.59.so is for Apache 2.0, and works with Apache 2.0.59 and later.
Rename to mod_jk.so before putting it in your 
Apache2/modules directory.




Re: discrepancy for tomcat connector file names for win32

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Fixed. Will take a little while until synced to the mirrors.

Caldarale, Charles R schrieb:
>> From: ljairath@uoguelph.ca [mailto:lkjairath@yahoo.com] 
>> Subject: discrepancy for tomcat connector file names for win32
>>
>> Is there a discrepancy at this URL 
>>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk
> -1.2.25/
>> for downloading the binaries for win32.
> 
> Yes, the files are misnamed.  Rainer posted this earlier today in
> another thread:
> 
> "Use the 2.0.29 file, because that was obviously simply named wrong when
> 
> putting on the download server and is in fact for httpd 2.0.*5*9 :)
> (and is fine for your 2.0.61)."
> 
>  - Chuck

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


RE: discrepancy for tomcat connector file names for win32

Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: ljairath@uoguelph.ca [mailto:lkjairath@yahoo.com] 
> Subject: discrepancy for tomcat connector file names for win32
> 
> Is there a discrepancy at this URL 
>
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk
-1.2.25/
> for downloading the binaries for win32.

Yes, the files are misnamed.  Rainer posted this earlier today in
another thread:

"Use the 2.0.29 file, because that was obviously simply named wrong when

putting on the download server and is in fact for httpd 2.0.*5*9 :)
(and is fine for your 2.0.61)."

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
and its attachments from all computers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org