You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Vijaya Kumar <vi...@businex.com> on 2001/08/28 08:46:23 UTC
PROPPATCH
Hi,
I have one general doubt about PROPPACTCH. Can I send the
PROPPACTH header to the tomcat server just like for the PROPFIND.
String body = "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\" ?>\r\n";
body += " <D:propertyupdate xmlns:D=\"DAV:\"\r\n";
body += " xmlns:Z=\"http://www.w3.com/standards/z39.50/\">\r\n";
body += " <D:set>\r\n";
body += " <D:prop>\r\n";
body += " <Z:authors>\r\n";
body += " <Z:Author>Jim Whitehead</Z:Author>\r\n";
body += " <Z:Author>Roy Fielding</Z:Author>\r\n";
body += " </Z:authors>\r\n";
body += " </D:prop>\r\n";
body += " </D:set>\r\n";
body += " <D:remove>\r\n";
body += " <D:prop><Z:Copyright-Owner/></D:prop>\r\n";
body += " </D:remove>\r\n";
body += " </D:propertyupdate>";
os.write("\n\nPROPATCH /webdav/Domain.xml HTTP/1.1".getBytes());
os.write("\nHost: localhost:8080".getBytes());
os.write("\nConnection: TE".getBytes());
os.write("\nTE: trailers, deflate, gzip, compress".getBytes());
os.write("\n\n".getBytes());
os.write(body.getBytes());
os.write(("Content-Length: "+body.length()).getBytes());
int ch=0;
while ((ch = is.read())!=-1)
System.out.print((char) ch);
ERROR Message I got
for the above is... What could be the reason... How can I use this Header...
Thanx
HTTP/1.1 501 Method PROPATCH is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported
by
the Servlet API
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: close
<html>
<head>
<title>Tomcat Error Report</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<br><br>
<h1>HTTP Status 501 - Method PROPATCH is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not
supp
orted by the Servlet API </h1>
The server does not support the functionality needed to fulfill this request
(Me
thod PROPATCH is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported by the Servlet
API
).
</body>
</html>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk Verbeeck" <di...@pandora.be>
To: <sl...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: ETag