[jira] Updated: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default handling

["Matt Cooper (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=all ]

Matt Cooper updated ADFFACES-33:
--------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
>          Key: ADFFACES-33
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
>      Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Build
>  Environment: Facet metadata
>     Reporter: Matt Cooper
>     Priority: Trivial

>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name".  The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time.  By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry.  Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira