You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by "Andi Huber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/01/31 09:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (ISIS-2511) Rationalize all @Named("...") @DomainXxx(objectType="...") namespaces.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andi Huber closed ISIS-2511.
----------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

all namespaces (for objectType="...") rationalized

> Rationalize all @Named("...") @DomainXxx(objectType="...") namespaces.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-2511
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2511
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andi Huber
>            Assignee: Andi Huber
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-M5
>
>
> Using uniform namespaces of form 
> - isis.applib.*
> - isis.metamodel.*
> - isis.persistence.*
> - isis.security.*
> - isis.runtime.*
> - isis.runtimeservices.*
> - isis.ext.*
> - isis.sub.*
> - isis.tooling.*
> ... etc
> These do not have to reflect exact Java package names nor module names, but should rather capture coarse grained structure along with easy readable semantics.
> Namespaces are allowed to span multiple modules.
> Namespaces should also rather be lowercase to avoid ambiguity.
> Why is this relevant? Because SecMan was reworked to now base its permission model on namespaces. Which also includes wildcard support.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)