Re: [hama-dev] Re: What do you think about collaboration with mahout?

[edward yoon <ed...@udanax.org>]

Yes, I absolutely agree with you. Perhaps we should arrange a issuing
with the mahout to discuss this.

Thanks,
Edward.

On 3/13/08, Chanwit Kaewkasi <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is really interesting to me that Mahout has the existing
> in-memory Matrix package, and Hama codes will expand this for parallel
> usage.
>
> I think we would be trying to unify both interface, or make Hama
> MatrixInterface to be conform with Mahout so that the code will be
> easier to integrate with it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chanwit
>
>
> On 13/03/2008, edward yoon <ed...@udanax.org> wrote:
> > We should do these things as a below report.
> >
> >  TODO :
> >
> >   * more comments
> >   * unit tests
> >
> >  ----
> >  I've downloaded the Hama package and integrated it into my mahout source
> >  tree. The code could use some more comments and a pile of unit tests are
> >  needed to demonstrate its correctness. Other than that, the implementation
> >  seems complementary with MAHOUT-6 and intended for manipulating very large
> >  matrices that are stored in Hbase. The two interfaces (Matrix and
> >  MatrixInterface) are pretty similar and could be coalesced easily to provide
> >  a single abstraction for in-memory and Hbased representations.
> >
> >  If both were in trunk, I'd be willing to work on those tasks.
> >
> >  +1
> >
> >  Jeff
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hama-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to hama-dev@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hama-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hama-dev?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>
>


-- 
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.