You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/23 18:51:31 UTC
Do we need to keep the AbstractPollingConnectionlessIoAcceptor class
at all ?
Hi,
just wondering if it would not be a better idea to simply merge the
AbstractPollingConnectionlessIoAcceptor and NioDatagramAcceptor classes
? We are *very* unlikely to extend the
AbstractPollingConnectionlessIoAcceptor class anyway...
thoughts ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: Do we need to keep the AbstractPollingConnectionlessIoAcceptor
class at all ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Le 10/23/12 7:34 PM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> I think we have too many abstract layer, so one less is a good idea
Done. Quite easy. Many lacking Javadoc though :/ /me going to work on
that ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: Do we need to keep the AbstractPollingConnectionlessIoAcceptor
class at all ?
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@gmail.com>.
I think we have too many abstract layer, so one less is a good idea
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wondering if it would not be a better idea to simply merge the
> AbstractPollingConnectionlessI**oAcceptor and NioDatagramAcceptor classes
> ? We are *very* unlikely to extend the
> AbstractPollingConnectionlessI**oAcceptor class anyway...
>
> thoughts ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>