You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@guacamole.apache.org by "Michael Jumper (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/29 01:29:58 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (GUACAMOLE-131) JavaScript libraries should not be
bundled in source
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael Jumper updated GUACAMOLE-131:
-------------------------------------
Description:
From [~gtrasuk] regarding 0.9.10-incubating:
{quote}
... I’m not sure what other projects do, but personally I’m not comfortable with distributing libraries in the source distribution. In fact, I’m not a fan of having them in source control. Would it be possible to assemble them into the binary at build time? I’m pretty sure there are artifacts in Maven Central for Angular and JQuery - certainly something like Bower should be an option if not?
{quote}
(See [the original email in the VOTE thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-guacamole-dev/201611.mbox/%3C4D7E4108-D0D5-41A7-8DF7-D91CB8406883%40stratuscom.com%3E])
We, also, are not fans. It looks like this can be resolved by migrating to [Webjars|http://www.webjars.org/]. This has the secondary effect of lessening the burden of updating the source LICENSE file (though the LICENSE file of build artifacts still needs to be updated).
was:
From [~gtrasuk] in regarding 0.9.10-incubating:
{quote}
... I’m not sure what other projects do, but personally I’m not comfortable with distributing libraries in the source distribution. In fact, I’m not a fan of having them in source control. Would it be possible to assemble them into the binary at build time? I’m pretty sure there are artifacts in Maven Central for Angular and JQuery - certainly something like Bower should be an option if not?
{quote}
(See [the original email in the VOTE thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-guacamole-dev/201611.mbox/%3C4D7E4108-D0D5-41A7-8DF7-D91CB8406883%40stratuscom.com%3E])
We, also, are not fans. It looks like this can be resolved by migrating to [Webjars|http://www.webjars.org/]. This has the secondary effect of lessening the burden of updating the source LICENSE file (though the LICENSE file of build artifacts still needs to be updated).
> JavaScript libraries should not be bundled in source
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-131
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-131
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Jumper
> Assignee: Michael Jumper
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.9.10-incubating
>
>
> From [~gtrasuk] regarding 0.9.10-incubating:
> {quote}
> ... I’m not sure what other projects do, but personally I’m not comfortable with distributing libraries in the source distribution. In fact, I’m not a fan of having them in source control. Would it be possible to assemble them into the binary at build time? I’m pretty sure there are artifacts in Maven Central for Angular and JQuery - certainly something like Bower should be an option if not?
> {quote}
> (See [the original email in the VOTE thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-guacamole-dev/201611.mbox/%3C4D7E4108-D0D5-41A7-8DF7-D91CB8406883%40stratuscom.com%3E])
> We, also, are not fans. It looks like this can be resolved by migrating to [Webjars|http://www.webjars.org/]. This has the secondary effect of lessening the burden of updating the source LICENSE file (though the LICENSE file of build artifacts still needs to be updated).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)