You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> on 2017/05/05 22:32:54 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Hi all,
Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
reconnect attempts:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-144%3A+Exponential+
backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
Thanks,
Ismael
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Thanks to everyone who votes and provided feedback. The vote passed with 6
binding +1s (Guozhang, Gwen, Sriram, Jay, Ismael, Joel) and 4 non-binding
+1s (Edoardo, Dana, Colin, Dongjin).
Ismael
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Dongjin Lee <do...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Joel Koshy <jj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 11:13, Dana Powers wrote:
> > > > +1 !
> > > >
> > > > On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Edoardo Comar
> > > > > IBM MessageHub
> > > > > ecomar@uk.ibm.com
> > > > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> > > > >
> > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with
> > number
> > > > > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> > Hants.
> > > PO6
> > > > > 3AU
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > > > reconnect attempts
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <
> ram@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I
> > would
> > > > > like
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for
> > > broker
> > > > > > > > reconnect attempts:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > > > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > > > > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > > > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> > > number
> > > > > 741598.
> > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> > PO6
> > > 3AU
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
>
>
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical
> world.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Dongjin Lee <do...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Joel Koshy <jj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 11:13, Dana Powers wrote:
> > > +1 !
> > >
> > > On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > > thanks
> > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > Edoardo Comar
> > > > IBM MessageHub
> > > > ecomar@uk.ibm.com
> > > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> > > >
> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with
> number
> > > > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> Hants.
> > PO6
> > > > 3AU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > > Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > > reconnect attempts
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I
> would
> > > > like
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for
> > broker
> > > > > > > reconnect attempts:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > > > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> > number
> > > > 741598.
> > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> PO6
> > 3AU
> > > >
> >
>
--
*Dongjin Lee*
*A hitchhiker in the mathematical
world.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
<http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
<http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
<http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
<http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter: www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
<http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Joel Koshy <jj...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 11:13, Dana Powers wrote:
> > +1 !
> >
> > On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > > thanks
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > Edoardo Comar
> > > IBM MessageHub
> > > ecomar@uk.ibm.com
> > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> > >
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number
> > > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants.
> PO6
> > > 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > reconnect attempts
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> > > like
> > > > to
> > > > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for
> broker
> > > > > > reconnect attempts:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 11:13, Dana Powers wrote:
> +1 !
>
> On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > thanks
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > Edoardo Comar
> > IBM MessageHub
> > ecomar@uk.ibm.com
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> >
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6
> > 3AU
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > reconnect attempts
> >
> >
> >
> > +1
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> > like
> > > to
> > > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > > > reconnect attempts:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Dana Powers <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 !
On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <EC...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
> thanks
> --------------------------------------------------
> Edoardo Comar
> IBM MessageHub
> ecomar@uk.ibm.com
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6
> 3AU
>
>
>
> From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> reconnect attempts
>
>
>
> +1
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would
> like
> > to
> > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > > reconnect attempts:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > > >
> > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Edoardo Comar <EC...@uk.ibm.com>.
+1 (non binding)
thanks
--------------------------------------------------
Edoardo Comar
IBM MessageHub
ecomar@uk.ibm.com
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number
741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6
3AU
From: Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 05/05/2017 23:19
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
reconnect attempts
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would
like
> to
> > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > reconnect attempts:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > >
> > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Gwen Shapira*
> > Product Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> >
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Jay Kreps <ja...@confluent.io>.
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
> to
> > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > > reconnect attempts:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 144%3A+Exponential+
> > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> > >
> > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Gwen Shapira*
> > Product Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Sriram Subramanian <ra...@confluent.io>.
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > reconnect attempts:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 144%3A+Exponential+
> > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
> >
> > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Gwen Shapira*
> Product Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> reconnect attempts:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-144%3A+Exponential+
> backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
>
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
--
*Gwen Shapira*
Product Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
<http://www.confluent.io/blog>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker reconnect attempts
Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> reconnect attempts:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-144%3A+Exponential+
> backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts
>
> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>
--
-- Guozhang