You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Angela Schreiber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/06/15 11:58:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9798) Inconsistent handling of supported permissions in CompositePermissionProviderOr

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17554534#comment-17554534 ] 

Angela Schreiber commented on OAK-9798:
---------------------------------------

update: 19e0818dff..7f3916fe08 fixes the accidential use of sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.NotImplementedException in the test case. thanks [~thomasm] for pointing it out! that was obviously not intended....

> Inconsistent handling of supported permissions in CompositePermissionProviderOr
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9798
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Angela Schreiber
>            Assignee: Angela Schreiber
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.44.0
>
>
> when comparing how {{CompositePermissionProviderOr}} and {{CompositeTreePermissionOr}} handle supported permissions in an aggreggated setup i noticed that {{CompositePermissionProviderOr}} relies on the aggregated providers to verify that permissions are supported upon evaluation of isGranted.
> this contrasts {{CompositeTreePermissionOr}} for which this is not required (as verified by  {{CompositeTreePermissionOrTest#testIsGrantedUncoveredPermissions}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)