You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/03 04:47:36 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-10062) Reconsider storing plaintext length
in the encrypted block header
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-10062:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Reconsider storing plaintext length in the encrypted block header (was: Store the encrypted data length in the block encryption header instead of plaintext length)
> Reconsider storing plaintext length in the encrypted block header
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10062
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.98.0
>
>
> After HBASE-7544, if an HFile belongs to an encrypted family, it is encrypted on a per block basis. The encrypted blocks include the following header:
> {noformat}
> // +--------------------------+
> // | vint plaintext length |
> // +--------------------------+
> // | vint iv length |
> // +--------------------------+
> // | iv data ... |
> // +--------------------------+
> // | encrypted block data ... |
> // +--------------------------+
> {noformat}
> The reason for storing the plaintext length is so we can create an decryption stream over the encrypted block data and, no matter the internal details of the crypto algorithm (whether it adds padding, etc.) after reading the expected plaintext bytes we know the reader is finished. However my colleague Jerry Chen pointed out today this construction mandates the block be processed exactly that way. Storing and using the encrypted data length instead could provide more implementation flexibility down the road.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)