You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> on 2022/10/27 19:55:07 UTC
docker versions?
With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0, should
we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
releases or should we go back to three digits?
Thank you, all!
Cheers,
Tim
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Eric,
Our current release cycle is ~5days. At the fastest, it would be 3. We
should be able to respond faster than that for OS level cves, I think.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:03 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
wrote:
> Would it make sense to just release new versions of Tika when you want to
> release new versions of the Docker image?
>
> > On Oct 27, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
> > e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0, should
> > we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
> > releases or should we go back to three digits?
> >
> > Thank you, all!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Konstantin Gribov <gr...@gmail.com>.
Tim, it's certainly a good idea.
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 7:22 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> Related question: any objection if I start tagging releases in our
> tika-docker repo?
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:06 PM Konstantin Gribov <gr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Eric, don't think so. Docker image is a derivative of the tika-server, so
> > it shouldn't dictate Tika version change IMHO
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Konstantin Gribov.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:03 PM Eric Pugh <
> > epugh@opensourceconnections.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would it make sense to just release new versions of Tika when you want
> to
> > > release new versions of the Docker image?
> > >
> > > > On Oct 27, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika
> version,
> > > > e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0,
> > should
> > > > we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our
> docker
> > > > releases or should we go back to three digits?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you, all!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > >
> > > _______________________
> > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
> |
> > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> > >
> > >
> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to
> be
> > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > > whether attachments are marked as such.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Related question: any objection if I start tagging releases in our
tika-docker repo?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:06 PM Konstantin Gribov <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eric, don't think so. Docker image is a derivative of the tika-server, so
> it shouldn't dictate Tika version change IMHO
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Gribov.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:03 PM Eric Pugh <
> epugh@opensourceconnections.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Would it make sense to just release new versions of Tika when you want to
> > release new versions of the Docker image?
> >
> > > On Oct 27, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
> > > e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0,
> should
> > > we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
> > > releases or should we go back to three digits?
> > >
> > > Thank you, all!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Tim
> >
> > _______________________
> > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >
> >
> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > whether attachments are marked as such.
> >
> >
>
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Konstantin Gribov <gr...@gmail.com>.
Eric, don't think so. Docker image is a derivative of the tika-server, so
it shouldn't dictate Tika version change IMHO
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:03 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
wrote:
> Would it make sense to just release new versions of Tika when you want to
> release new versions of the Docker image?
>
> > On Oct 27, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
> > e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0, should
> > we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
> > releases or should we go back to three digits?
> >
> > Thank you, all!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>.
Would it make sense to just release new versions of Tika when you want to release new versions of the Docker image?
> On Oct 27, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
> e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0, should
> we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
> releases or should we go back to three digits?
>
> Thank you, all!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
Re: docker versions?
Posted by Konstantin Gribov <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Tim.
I think a four segment version (e.g. 2.6.0.0 or 2.6.0.1 as the first image
for the 2.6.0) would be better for automation (esp when using bash scripts)
but have no strong feelings against using just 2.6.0.
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:55 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> With TIKA-3906, we added a "docker version" number to the tika version,
> e.g. 2.5.0.1. When the next version of Tika comes out, say 2.6.0, should
> we start with a four digit docker version, e.g. 2.6.0.0 for our docker
> releases or should we go back to three digits?
>
> Thank you, all!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>