You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> on 2006/10/25 15:09:43 UTC
[VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Hi,
A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12444414>)
has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be brought out into a
public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for this report is
using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was introduced in JDK 1.4.
Patrick's original concern is that we should continue to support JDK 1.3.
Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how important it
is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now Patrick's) is that
we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above. Here's your chance to vote...
Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
+1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
-1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3.
+/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
Thanks,
Kevin
Re: [VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Abe White <aw...@bea.com>.
> +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Patrick. I hadn't even realized that we had that specified in the
pom.xml. Learn something new everyday with this project... :-)
Kevin
On 11/10/06, Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> wrote:
>
> I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to
> openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and
> target instead of 1.3.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:kwsutter@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM
> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
> >
> > Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no
> > longer supported, I
> > recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...
> >
> > +1 4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
> > +/- 0 1 vote
> > -1 0 votes
> >
> > Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and
> > beyond. Thanks.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63
> > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
> > >
> > >
> > <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments
> > #action_12444414>)
> > > has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be
> > brought out into a
> > > public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for
> > this report is
> > > using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was
> > introduced in JDK
> > > 1.4. Patrick's original concern is that we should continue
> > to support JDK
> > > 1.3. Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> > > important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now
> > > Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.
> > Here's your
> > > chance to vote...
> > >
> > > Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
> > > requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
> > >
> > > +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> > > -1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3.
> > > +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> >
>
RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com>.
I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to
openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and
target instead of 1.3.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:kwsutter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
>
> Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no
> longer supported, I
> recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...
>
> +1 4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
> +/- 0 1 vote
> -1 0 votes
>
> Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and
> beyond. Thanks.
>
> Kevin
>
> On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63
> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
> >
> >
> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments
> #action_12444414>)
> > has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be
> brought out into a
> > public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for
> this report is
> > using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was
> introduced in JDK
> > 1.4. Patrick's original concern is that we should continue
> to support JDK
> > 1.3. Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> > important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now
> > Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.
> Here's your
> > chance to vote...
> >
> > Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
> > requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
> >
> > +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> > -1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3.
> > +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
>
[RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no longer supported, I
recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...
+1 4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
+/- 0 1 vote
-1 0 votes
Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and beyond. Thanks.
Kevin
On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
>
> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12444414>)
> has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be brought out into a
> public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for this report is
> using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was introduced in JDK
> 1.4. Patrick's original concern is that we should continue to support JDK
> 1.3. Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now
> Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above. Here's your
> chance to vote...
>
> Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
> requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
>
> +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> -1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3.
> +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
Re: [VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
+1: I vote for supporting only 1.4 and higher.
On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Hi,
> A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 (
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63<http://
> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?
> page=comments#action_12444414>)
> has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be brought
> out into a
> public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for this
> report is
> using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was introduced in
> JDK 1.4.
> Patrick's original concern is that we should continue to support
> JDK 1.3.
> Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
> important it
> is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now Patrick's)
> is that
> we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above. Here's your chance to vote...
>
> Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
> requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
>
> +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
> -1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3.
> +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
RE: [VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?
Posted by Pinaki Poddar <pp...@bea.com>.
> Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no
requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
+1
Pinaki Poddar
BEA Systems
415.402.7317
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.