[Jim6951@aol.com] HATE THIS

[Randy Terbush <ra...@Covalent.NET>]

Well... He *is* running a Mac...  :-)

Re: [Jim6951@aol.com] HATE THIS

[Randy Terbush <ra...@Covalent.NET>]

Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com> writes:
> Randy Terbush wrote:
> > 
> > Well... He *is* running a Mac...  :-)
> 
> So, did you reply?  If no-one has, I will.

No. I did not. From experience, these sorts of emails lead
down a very dark path. 

> It really is too bad we can't assume SSIs are enabled, because I
> think this would be nicely fixed (for new installations, at least)
> if the page said something like "installed on Web server
> <!--#echo var="SERVER_NAME" -->".  Existing installations are,
> of course, one of the crosses we get to bear for the original
> ambiguous wording.

We could accomplish the same thing by generating this HTML at
compile time. For that matter, we could probably dynamically
load a new module that outputs the message then delete the
module. :-)

Re: [Jim6951@aol.com] HATE THIS

[Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>]

Randy Terbush wrote:
> 
> Well... He *is* running a Mac...  :-)

So, did you reply?  If no-one has, I will.

It really is too bad we can't assume SSIs are enabled, because I
think this would be nicely fixed (for new installations, at least)
if the page said something like "installed on Web server
<!--#echo var="SERVER_NAME" -->".  Existing installations are,
of course, one of the crosses we get to bear for the original
ambiguous wording.

#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar                    <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/>
Apache Group member         <http://www.apache.org/>
"Apache Server for Dummies" <http://WWW.Dummies.Com/