You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2014/09/05 19:10:07 UTC

[Issue 124783] Unsupported macosx_x86_64 extension platform

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124783

--- Comment #4 from Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Andrea Pescetti from comment #3)
> Should this one be a candidate for 4.1.1 too? Patch seems simple and it
> fixes a common broken use case. Just nominate it for 4.1.1 in case.

(Sorry for the late answer) No, it does not make sense to integrate it in a
micro release, because the  <OpenOffice.org-minimal-version> and
<OpenOffice.org-maximal-version> must be specified in "major.minor" format,
without including the micro, see 

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fdependencies.2FOpenOffice.org-minimal-version

Required. String. The required underlying OpenOffice.org version (“2.1”, “2.2”,
etc.), starting with OpenOffice.org 2.1. You should not specify a particular
micro version, e.g. “2.2.1”, use “2.2” instead.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all issue changes.