Re: tag..can you not pass more than one request parameter using the convenction of ?param=value¶m2=value2??

[Rod McChesney <ro...@expressaction.com>]

> when I try to do the ?command=0&param=value passing a 2nd argument, I 

Try

?command=0&param=value

That might work.

Rod McChesney


Kevin Duffey wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been able to use the following action.xml syntax to forward to an
> action from an action by passing a "command" parameter.
> 
>   <action
>       path             =  "/EnrollmentMaintenance"
>       actionClass      =  "com.bm.admin.actions.EnrollmentMaintenanceAction"
>       formAttribute    =  "EnrollmentMaintenanceBean"
>       formClass        =  "com.bm.admin.beans.EnrollmentMaintenanceBean">
> 
>       <forward name="DefaultOK" path="/enrollments.jsp" redirect="false" />
>       <forward name="DefaultError" path="/enrollments.jsp" redirect="false"
> />
>       <forward name="UpdateOK" path="/EnrollmentMaintenance.do?command=0"
> redirect="false" />
>       <forward name="UpdateError" path="/enrollments.jsp" redirect="false"
> />
>       <forward name="QuickUpdateOK"
> path="/EnrollmentMaintenance.do?command=0" redirect="false" />
>       <forward name="QuickUpdateError" path="/enrollments.jsp"
> redirect="false" />
>   </action>
> 
> Notice for example in the UpdateOK, how it calls itself basically,
> EnrollmentMaintenance.do but it passes a parameter (via request) much link
> you can do with a link  <a href="page.jsp?param=value&param2=value2"></a>.
> The problem I have now is that I can pass the ?command=x no problem. But
> when I try to do the ?command=0&param=value passing a 2nd argument, I get a
> SAXxml parsing error. IT tells me I need to terminate entity with ;. When I
> put a ; after the ?command=0; it works fine, but the parameter param=value
> does not come across in the request.
> 
> So the question is, is this not possible? I would like to pass 2 or more
> parameters to the .do action in the forward part of another action mapping
> as I have above. If anyone could shed light on this, that would be great.
> 
> Thanks.