You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucy.apache.org by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> on 2010/12/15 01:28:15 UTC
[lucy-dev] ReleaseGuide wiki and version numbering format
Peter Karman edited the wiki:
> + Apache Lucy uses the following X.Y.Z versioning scheme:
> + {{{
> + ASF release => lucy-0.2.0-incubating.tar.gz
> + CPAN release => Lucy-0.2.0.1.tar.gz
> + Documentation => 0.2.0.1
> + META.yml => 0.002000001
> + $VERSION => "0.002000001"
> + }}}
> +
> + See the discussion [[http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucy-dev/201012.mbox/browser|here]].
Just so we're on the same page...
I was imagining that the first CPAN release for Lucy 0.2.0 would also be
called "0.2.0", and that we'd only create a CPAN release called "0.2.0.1" if
we botched "0.2.0". To me, the chart above implies that you expect the ASF
release and the initial CPAN release to have different version numbers from
the get go. Am I grokking you right?
Marvin Humphrey
Re: [lucy-dev] ReleaseGuide wiki and version numbering format
Posted by Peter Karman <pe...@peknet.com>.
Marvin Humphrey wrote on 12/14/10 6:28 PM:
> Peter Karman edited the wiki:
>
>> + Apache Lucy uses the following X.Y.Z versioning scheme:
>> + {{{
>> + ASF release => lucy-0.2.0-incubating.tar.gz
>> + CPAN release => Lucy-0.2.0.1.tar.gz
>> + Documentation => 0.2.0.1
>> + META.yml => 0.002000001
>> + $VERSION => "0.002000001"
>> + }}}
>> +
>> + See the discussion [[http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucy-dev/201012.mbox/browser|here]].
>
> Just so we're on the same page...
>
> I was imagining that the first CPAN release for Lucy 0.2.0 would also be
> called "0.2.0", and that we'd only create a CPAN release called "0.2.0.1" if
> we botched "0.2.0". To me, the chart above implies that you expect the ASF
> release and the initial CPAN release to have different version numbers from
> the get go. Am I grokking you right?
>
ah no. We are imagining the same thing. My copy/paste does imply differently
though. I'll amend it.
--
Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . peter@peknet.com