You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by Da...@equifax.com on 2003/01/08 17:45:23 UTC
Odd 0.9.8 "bug"
We just upgrade to 0.9.8 from 0.9.4. We've found one thing which we
*think* is a bug in OJB. (It's definately a change in behavior).
We have an A and several B's. The A class descriptor has a collection
descriptor to B, and the B class descriptor has a reference descriptor to A
In 0.9.4, we would lock A, and if there were any new Bs, they would be
assigned an OID automatically, and committed to the database when A was
committed.
In 0.9.8, we find new Bs are given an OID, but they are not written to the
database. However, shortly afterwards (apparently after we do some
seemingly un-related write), we find the new Bs have been written out.
What's going on? Here are the choices I see:
0.9.8 has a bug.
- or -
0.9.4 had a bug that is not fixed. (we have to lock the new B's manually to
get them committed)
Thanks.
David
This message contains information from Equifax Inc. which may be
confidential and privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, please
refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
information and note that such actions are prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify by e-mail
postmaster@equifax.com.