You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "Geoffrey Jacoby (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/10/23 17:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5541) Redundant Global Mutable Index Writes

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5541:
-------------------------------------
    Attachment: PHOENIX-5541.patch

> Redundant Global Mutable Index Writes
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5541
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5541
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 4.14.3
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5541.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In the inaccurately-named IndexWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure, there's the following code:
> {code:java}
> public void writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(Collection<Pair<Mutation, byte[]>> indexUpdates, boolean allowLocalUpdates, int clientVersion) throws IOException { 
> // convert the strings to htableinterfaces to which we can talk and group by TABLE Multimap<HTableInterfaceReference, Mutation> toWrite = resolveTableReferences(indexUpdates); 
> writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(toWrite, allowLocalUpdates, clientVersion); writeAndHandleFailure(toWrite, allowLocalUpdates, clientVersion); 
> }
> {code}
> writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure and writeAndHandleFailure seem to be identical, which means that calling them both will result in the same index Cells being written twice. This shouldn't affect correctness, but it will affect performance and (temporarily, until compaction) storage



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)