You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "David Smiley (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/02/19 04:31:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-18111) Remove org.apache.solr.legacy.Legacy* Field Types

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Smiley resolved SOLR-18111.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Duplicate

> Remove org.apache.solr.legacy.Legacy* Field Types
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-18111
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18111
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Eric Pugh
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have a set of various legacy field types like LegacyLongField and LegacyInField that should not be used in favour of better implementations like LongPoint and IntPoint.
> One nuance is that there may be value in keeping these legacy fields, and if so, then the right answer is to undeprecate them.  And instead leave the annotation that you SHOULD be using IntPoint.  However, considering our ref guide section on "How to pick numeric types" doesn't even mention these: [https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/indexing-guide/field-type-definitions-and-properties.html#choosing-appropriate-numeric-types] then I think they are fair game to be removed.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org