[GitHub] [arrow-datafusion] jorgecarleitao commented on issue #234: Consider publishing crate as arrow-datafusion

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

jorgecarleitao commented on issue #234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/234#issuecomment-830849093


   IMO it is more important to have a version that correctly represents the state of the software than `datafusion` in cargo.
   
   IMO 0.X is the correct state of the software, both from a security point of view and if we plan to integrate Ballista more closely with DataFusion.
   
   I find it odd that the vast majority of the software in Rust is pre-1, but arrow, parquet, DataFusion, etc, is post-1 (and all of them with an API that is essentially unstable). IMO that is an historical artifact, and we rather correct it sooner than later.
   
   The perception of 3.0 in Rust is that the software had a significant maturation time.
   
   From a users' perspective, the switch is a very low effort and I do think that we have the necessary channels to market any change (mailing, slack, github, cargo.io, etc).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org