You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> on 2015/08/09 22:48:50 UTC

Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates


On 07/24/2015 02:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 18/07/2015 bugzilla wrote:
>> Kay has asked  for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
>> Issue 121492: Base can not filter by dates
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121492
> 
> This one looks good. Patch written by Hanya, discussed at length, and
> available since January 2014, included by Kay in trunk in September
> 2014, 14 votes.
> 
> If we get some more testing (it's easily available on any dev version)
> it would be absolutely OK for me to include it in OpenOffice 4.1.2.
> 
> Comment from https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121492: For
> better evaluation for inclusion in 4.1.2, it would help a lot if someone
> tested this with https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/
> (recent Windows development builds; we have Linux builds available too,
> see link above for full list) and confirmed that everything works as
> expected. Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.

We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure
you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to go.



-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 08/11/2015 01:51 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of
>> supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix?
> 
> It worked, see
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/dbaccess/?pathrev=1695343
> and you will see that in the mergeinfo list you have the revision you
> actually merged.

OK, good.

> 
> If it doesn't work (i.e., you commit only the files but not the
> directory), svn status will reported that the directory is changed ("U"
> status) and you can commit it separately, even though it is only a
> metadata commit.

This is good to know. I did a commit from /main, not from the top of the
branch really, but the svn diffs were the same either way, so I was
hoping this would produce the same results.

> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.


-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Kay Schenk wrote:
> OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of
> supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix?

It worked, see 
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/dbaccess/?pathrev=1695343 
and you will see that in the mergeinfo list you have the revision you 
actually merged.

If it doesn't work (i.e., you commit only the files but not the 
directory), svn status will reported that the directory is changed ("U" 
status) and you can commit it separately, even though it is only a 
metadata commit.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 08/11/2015 09:21 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/11/2015 12:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from
>>> "main" even if I only merged to one file?
>>
>> Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered
>> by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you
>> committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not
>> synchronized with the repository.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Andrea.
> 
> Well I'm glad I asked. When I did a diff from either main or the from
> the directory in which the file resided, it was the same output so this
> is why I asked. OK, I will take care of this shortly.
> 

OK, I'm not sure this worked correctly or not in terms of
supplying/preserving the meta information. If not, how to fix?

-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 08/11/2015 12:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from
>> "main" even if I only merged to one file?
> 
> Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered
> by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you
> committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not
> synchronized with the repository.
> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.

Well I'm glad I asked. When I did a diff from either main or the from
the directory in which the file resided, it was the same output so this
is why I asked. OK, I will take care of this shortly.

-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
On 10/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
> OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from
> "main" even if I only merged to one file?

Thank you, and yes as I saw it the merge-tracking changes are considered 
by SVN to be changes in the directory (so in main, not in the files you 
committed), so committing only the file will still leave your copy not 
synchronized with the repository.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 08/10/2015 12:39 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure
>> you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to
>> go.
> 
> Yes, there was a problem left (same set of comments) with the user who
> reported issues with a PostgreSQL backend but I would say this is
> unrelated and the investigation didn't seem to yield anything. So for
> the time being we can surely port the patch from trunk to the AOO410
> branch.
> 
> If you wish, you can do so too, preferably with SVN merge as discussed in
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281#c11
> (so SVN will track the merge automatically).
> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.

OK, I have my merge ready to commit. But should I actually commit from
"main" even if I only merged to one file?

-- 
--------------------------------------------
MzK

“The journey of a thousand miles begins
 with a single step.”
                          --Lao Tzu



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 121492] Base can not filter by dates

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
On 09/08/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
> We had a Windows tester on this a few days after this post. I'm sure
> you've seen the comments in the BZ entry. I think this one is ready to go.

Yes, there was a problem left (same set of comments) with the user who 
reported issues with a PostgreSQL backend but I would say this is 
unrelated and the investigation didn't seem to yield anything. So for 
the time being we can surely port the patch from trunk to the AOO410 branch.

If you wish, you can do so too, preferably with SVN merge as discussed in
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281#c11
(so SVN will track the merge automatically).

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org