Re: peg revision added to checkout path

[Mathias Weinert <ma...@gfa-net.de>]

Any ideas or comments to the following post I made on 01/25?

Thanks

Mathias

"Mathias Weinert" <ma...@gfa-net.de> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> I found something which first seems to be bug for me. I am not
> sure if I even already read about it but at least I didn't find
> anything in the issue tracker. But after thinking a while it
> might also be a feature. So here comes the description:
> 
> I want to check out a path that doesn't exist any more so I use
> a peg revision. Unfortunately Subversion uses the @-suffix to
> build the working copy path name if I don't provide one:
> 
> $ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir@223
> A    olddir@223/file2.txt
> A    olddir@223/newdir
> A    olddir@223/branchfile.txt
> Checked out revision 223.
> 
> This happens with Subversion 1.3.0 under cygwin as well as when
> I use the win32 binaries.
> 
> As already said: is this a bug or a feature?
> 
> Mathias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: peg revision added to checkout path

[Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com>]

On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:59, Mathias Weinert wrote:

>> I found something which first seems to be bug for me. I am not
>> sure if I even already read about it but at least I didn't find
>> anything in the issue tracker. But after thinking a while it
>> might also be a feature. So here comes the description:
>>
>> I want to check out a path that doesn't exist any more so I use
>> a peg revision. Unfortunately Subversion uses the @-suffix to
>> build the working copy path name if I don't provide one:
>>
>> $ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir@223
>> A    olddir@223/file2.txt
>> A    olddir@223/newdir
>> A    olddir@223/branchfile.txt
>> Checked out revision 223.
>>
>> This happens with Subversion 1.3.0 under cygwin as well as when
>> I use the win32 binaries.
>>
>> As already said: is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Any ideas or comments to the following post I made on 01/25?

My personal feeling is that this is a bug. Just my 0.02 €.

It's of course not difficult to avoid if you don't want it:

$ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir@223 olddir



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org