You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2006/08/10 21:26:23 UTC
Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Roy would prefer we determine the active consensus. Please vote for what
> you believe is the principal, proper name of the product we create from
> the sources located in the http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/
> repository (vote for one);
>
> This reflects the name of the -current releases- only, we aren't asking you to
> choose (or add) your desired name for -future versions-.
>
> httpd fielding (implicit)
> Apache httpd
> Apache httpd Server
> Apache HTTP Server wrowe, nd, sctemme, maxime
> Apache niq (implicit)
Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like joining the fray
when Roy and Will go at it?
In any case, although I don't disagree with niq that almost everyone knows this
as 'Apache', that isn't/cannot be our product name, and I think just about all
here would agree. The clever Apache Web Server was interesting, but in the
archives that was considered/eliminated on several occasions in the past.
Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Roy would prefer we determine the active consensus. Please vote
>> for what
>> you believe is the principal, proper name of the product we create
>> from
>> the sources located in the http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/
>> httpd/
>> repository (vote for one);
>>
>> This reflects the name of the -current releases- only, we aren't
>> asking you to
>> choose (or add) your desired name for -future versions-.
>>
>> httpd fielding (implicit)
>> Apache httpd
>> Apache httpd Server
>> Apache HTTP Server wrowe, nd, sctemme, maxime
>> Apache niq (implicit)
>
> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
> joining the fray
> when Roy and Will go at it?
>
> In any case, although I don't disagree with niq that almost
> everyone knows this
> as 'Apache', that isn't/cannot be our product name, and I think
> just about all
> here would agree. The clever Apache Web Server was interesting,
> but in the
> archives that was considered/eliminated on several occasions in the
> past.
I think it would have been more effective to place a list of product
names in STATUS and let people vote for the ones they like, dislike,
or don't care. That way we wouldn't be limited to the list you gave.
I've been too busy this month to care -- I came back from vacation to
find that our entire office needs to move down the street within the
next three weeks and the new office needs power, phones, network wires,
and all that other stuff designed and installed before move-in.
....Roy
Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
Well I'm on vacation so thats why I don't reply much.
But i do agree that it does more than just just HTTP.
this will be even more true if mod_ftp gets out of incubator.
So I'm not really for the HTTP in de name.
On 8/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh <co...@stdlib.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
> > joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
>
> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
> about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're about delivering information
> using many different protocols accross the internet. I don't know,
> something like Internet Information Server just seems more appropriate
> somehow.
>
> --
> Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net
>
--
~Jorge
Re: Product name - for future versions
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
> I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice.
I like this a lot too!
(Or either Apache World Dominitation Project j/k)
--
~Jorge
Re: Product name - for future versions
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Paul Querna wrote:
>
> I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice. The ASF'S
> ASF is the ultimate way to deliver data from a server :)
:) ++1
Re: Product name - for future versions
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
>>> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
>> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
>> about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're about delivering information
>> using many different protocols accross the internet. I don't know,
>> something like Internet Information Server just seems more appropriate
>> somehow.
>
> LOL :) Well as I said; focus is on the name of what's /repos/asf/httpd/httpd
> today. Granted, "d" might be a bit too general, but I agree with everyone
> who's said that the 'next release' aught to get a broader name than just
> plain old Apache HTTP Server. Apache ++HTTP Server? Apache Scheme[] Server?
> Some wordplay with MPM (since that's by far the distinguishing characteristic
> of today's httpd over all previous ones, and colors the implementation of any
> protocol that's compiled into the server.)
>
> Apache Empeem Server?
Man, naming incubator projects is hell enough, why bring that kind of
wasted time to dev@httpd?
On a serious note, For all future 1.3.x and 2.x releases, 'Apache HTTP
Server' or whatever the consensus turns out to be is fine by me.
I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice. The ASF'S
ASF is the ultimate way to deliver data from a server :)
Anyways, I honestly don't care about this in any real manner until we
are much closer to a 3.0 stage.
-Paul
Product name - for future versions
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
>> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
>
> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
> about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're about delivering information
> using many different protocols accross the internet. I don't know,
> something like Internet Information Server just seems more appropriate
> somehow.
LOL :) Well as I said; focus is on the name of what's /repos/asf/httpd/httpd
today. Granted, "d" might be a bit too general, but I agree with everyone
who's said that the 'next release' aught to get a broader name than just
plain old Apache HTTP Server. Apache ++HTTP Server? Apache Scheme[] Server?
Some wordplay with MPM (since that's by far the distinguishing characteristic
of today's httpd over all previous ones, and colors the implementation of any
protocol that's compiled into the server.)
Apache Empeem Server?
Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
Posted by Colm MacCarthaigh <co...@stdlib.net>.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're about delivering information
using many different protocols accross the internet. I don't know,
something like Internet Information Server just seems more appropriate
somehow.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net
Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 08/10/2006 09:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>Roy would prefer we determine the active consensus. Please vote for what
>>you believe is the principal, proper name of the product we create from
>>the sources located in the http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/
>>repository (vote for one);
>>
>>This reflects the name of the -current releases- only, we aren't asking you to
>>choose (or add) your desired name for -future versions-.
>>
>> Apache HTTP Server wrowe, nd, sctemme, maxime
+1
Regards
Rüdiger