You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@devicemap.apache.org by Reza <re...@yahoo.com.INVALID> on 2014/10/20 18:21:57 UTC
Java client release and graduation
I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1 before starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think releasing the java client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and momentum for the graduation process. :)
So im going to fix 1 more ticket and then begin the voting process for the 1.1 java client later this week.
Also, Radu, I updated the devicedata and javaclient modules in the whiteboard. I simply copied the moinmoin wiki markup into the source, so im not 100% sure the markup is valid.
So... once again, I actually feel that redoing the site so its "ours", as in custom to devicemap, will be a good thing and help build the excitement required to get us motivated to graduate. So I do not want to lose momentum on this...!
thanks,
Reza
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
OK, looks like it has a decent CFP duration, it is open now, but doesn't
end till Feb 2015, so it looks like you still got some time to find out if
you have time[?]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Lots of client improvements for from 1.0 to 1.1:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-40?jql=project%20%3D%20DMAP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.1.0%20Java%22
>
>
> -Type is now part of a pattern, before it was an attribute of the device.
> So essentially we have proper pattern ranking, so 1 pattern can be ranked
> above another pattern.
> -DeviceMapClient factory. Easier and less error prone to initialize and
> pattern index the client.
> -Device object. So you can now classify a string as a Device, this gives
> you access to Device specific attributes, instead of just a generic map.
> This is important when we want to split our attributes up into 3
> classifications: device, os, and browser.
> -Better logging.
>
> Might be able to swing ApacheCon NA. Current schedule doesnt allow me much
> free time outside of my current contributions, but that may change next
> year. So too early to tell.
>
> From: Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
> To: "devicemap-dev@incubator.apache.org" <
> devicemap-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Reza <re...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Java client release and graduation
>
> Can you tell us about major differences between 1.0.1 and 1.1?
> Not sure, how long it'll take but if there is a notable feature or
> improvement, it would be worth sharing at next months ApacheCon Europe.
> Did you also propose something for ApacheCon NA or is it too far for you
> to reach?
> Thanks,Werner
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1 before
> starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think releasing
> the java client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and
> momentum for the graduation process. :)
>
> So im going to fix 1 more ticket and then begin the voting process for the
> 1.1 java client later this week.
>
> Also, Radu, I updated the devicedata and javaclient modules in the
> whiteboard. I simply copied the moinmoin wiki markup into the source, so im
> not 100% sure the markup is valid.
> So... once again, I actually feel that redoing the site so its "ours", as
> in custom to devicemap, will be a good thing and help build the excitement
> required to get us motivated to graduate. So I do not want to lose momentum
> on this...!
>
> thanks,
> Reza
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Reza <re...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Lots of client improvements for from 1.0 to 1.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-40?jql=project%20%3D%20DMAP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.1.0%20Java%22
-Type is now part of a pattern, before it was an attribute of the device. So essentially we have proper pattern ranking, so 1 pattern can be ranked above another pattern.
-DeviceMapClient factory. Easier and less error prone to initialize and pattern index the client.
-Device object. So you can now classify a string as a Device, this gives you access to Device specific attributes, instead of just a generic map. This is important when we want to split our attributes up into 3 classifications: device, os, and browser.
-Better logging.
Might be able to swing ApacheCon NA. Current schedule doesnt allow me much free time outside of my current contributions, but that may change next year. So too early to tell.
From: Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
To: "devicemap-dev@incubator.apache.org" <de...@incubator.apache.org>; Reza <re...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: Java client release and graduation
Can you tell us about major differences between 1.0.1 and 1.1?
Not sure, how long it'll take but if there is a notable feature or improvement, it would be worth sharing at next months ApacheCon Europe.
Did you also propose something for ApacheCon NA or is it too far for you to reach?
Thanks,Werner
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1 before starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think releasing the java client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and momentum for the graduation process. :)
So im going to fix 1 more ticket and then begin the voting process for the 1.1 java client later this week.
Also, Radu, I updated the devicedata and javaclient modules in the whiteboard. I simply copied the moinmoin wiki markup into the source, so im not 100% sure the markup is valid.
So... once again, I actually feel that redoing the site so its "ours", as in custom to devicemap, will be a good thing and help build the excitement required to get us motivated to graduate. So I do not want to lose momentum on this...!
thanks,
Reza
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Can you tell us about major differences between 1.0.1 and 1.1?
Not sure, how long it'll take but if there is a notable feature or
improvement, it would be worth sharing at next months ApacheCon Europe.
Did you also propose something for ApacheCon NA or is it too far for you to
reach?
Thanks,
Werner
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1 before
> starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think releasing
> the java client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and
> momentum for the graduation process. :)
>
> So im going to fix 1 more ticket and then begin the voting process for the
> 1.1 java client later this week.
>
> Also, Radu, I updated the devicedata and javaclient modules in the
> whiteboard. I simply copied the moinmoin wiki markup into the source, so im
> not 100% sure the markup is valid.
> So... once again, I actually feel that redoing the site so its "ours", as
> in custom to devicemap, will be a good thing and help build the excitement
> required to get us motivated to graduate. So I do not want to lose momentum
> on this...!
>
> thanks,
> Reza
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Having a 1.1 Client released and reported through the regular PMC cycle
seems just fine, if the "ball" is rolling towards gratuation, I see no
reason to delay that, especially with ApacheCon Europe around the Corner[?]
Werner
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> > ...I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1
> before
> > starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think
> releasing the java
> > client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and
> momentum
> > for the graduation process. :)...
>
> I don't think waiting is useful, one more release will not make a
> difference in terms of graduation.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2014 indicates that the
> graduation resolution is being prepared, as discussed here - I don't
> see any new elements that justify waiting.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Reza <re...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Sure, I agree. We can graduate, then release.
Re: Java client release and graduation
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Reza <re...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> ...I would like to go ahead and propose we release the java client 1.1 before
> starting the graduating process. While its not required, I think releasing the java
> client and publishing it to maven will give me more ammunition and momentum
> for the graduation process. :)...
I don't think waiting is useful, one more release will not make a
difference in terms of graduation.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2014 indicates that the
graduation resolution is being prepared, as discussed here - I don't
see any new elements that justify waiting.
-Bertrand