You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Raymond Feng (Commented) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2012/02/08 22:05:01 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13203979#comment-13203979 ] 

Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-3924:
---------------------------------------

The changes seem to cause a regression where the base class has SCA annotated fields as references or properties.
                
> Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3924
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.x
>            Reporter: Vijai Kalathur
>            Assignee: Simon Laws
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
>
>
> In the scenario where the Service impl class extends a class which has no SCA annotations in it, protected fields in the base class are interpreted like Properties.
> Ideally, only the fields in the impl class should be introspected for References/Properties.  The fields in the base class should not be interpreted as References/Properties if there are no SCA annotations. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira