You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/19 20:49:30 UTC
[Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe
[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> I understand that involve trinidad build in this vote tends to be confusing.
> But the question to be solved is what to best? rollback? separate the
> vote? let it as is?.
just send out a different mail on the Trinidad Plugins
release, and you'll get my +1
-Matthias
>
> I'm open to hear all suggestions.
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
The problem is that if we want to solve MYFACES-1790 for this release,
we need to
release trinidad build as well. I also prepare the release of trinidad
build on my private account here:
http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/trinidad-build126
and I wrote the steps done on
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease121
Based on this, I prepare the release again. So no snapshots dependencies left.
I understand that involve trinidad build in this vote tends to be confusing.
But the question to be solved is what to best? rollback? separate the
vote? let it as is?.
I'm open to hear all suggestions.
Leonardo Uribe
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi,
this is confusing and not everybody notices a vote for the trinidad plugins,
that is nested in a myfaces-core release vote :-)
As I said on a different thread (the one that talks about the plugins
release), I'll get
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-878
done as well. Fix is trivial, but I need some more testing....
-Matthias
On Dec 20, 2007 2:58 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> MyFaces core out.
>
> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
> 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild" v 1.2.6 [3]
>
> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]).
>
> Please take a look at the "1.2.1" artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> +1 votes (see [3]).
>
> ------------------------------
> ------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/trinidad-build126
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild" v 1.2.6 [3]
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]).
Please take a look at the "1.2.1" artifacts and vote!
Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).
------------------------------
------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe
[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/trinidad-build126
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
hi,
don't get me wrong; but fixing 1790 means the build
depends on a SNAPSHOT.
I can provide the RC for the 1.2.6 plugins today (for a vote)
That would fix the SNAPSHOT dependency.
Again, thanks for doing this!!!
-Matthias
On Dec 20, 2007 2:55 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have done the release procedure again including
>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-plugin-parent</artifactId>
>
> For resolve MYFACES-1790 and moved LICENSE and NOTICE to META-INF
> folder for both myfaces api and impl.
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Is this still a vote now?
Can we start a separate thread?
regards,
Martin
On 12/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> the plugin includes the notice/license
> if not present, it generates them
>
> -M
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 8:06 AM, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:52 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > As it happens, there is quite a vigorous discussion going on right now
> > > > in both apache commons and legal-discuss lists regarding NOTICE and
> > > > LICENSE files. Some people would like to use a maven feature to
> > > > auto-generate LICENSE and NOTICE files. This is quite controversial,
> > > > though, and a number of people prefer the existing apache-commons way
> > > > (including myself).
> > >
> > > I like having them in the root folder, like done in Trinidad
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > >
> > > but, the auto-generation plugins is fine for including them in
> > > every JAR. Trinidad uses that plugin as well.
> >
> > ??
> >
> > Do you mean there is a license and notice checked in, but the built jar
> > ignores these and uses something different instead? That sounds like the
> > worst of both worlds to me. It would:
> > (a) double the work, as *both* need to be checked for correctness, and
> > (b) is really confusing for users if they differ.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
the plugin includes the notice/license
if not present, it generates them
-M
On Dec 20, 2007 8:06 AM, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:52 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > As it happens, there is quite a vigorous discussion going on right now
> > > in both apache commons and legal-discuss lists regarding NOTICE and
> > > LICENSE files. Some people would like to use a maven feature to
> > > auto-generate LICENSE and NOTICE files. This is quite controversial,
> > > though, and a number of people prefer the existing apache-commons way
> > > (including myself).
> >
> > I like having them in the root folder, like done in Trinidad
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> >
> > but, the auto-generation plugins is fine for including them in
> > every JAR. Trinidad uses that plugin as well.
>
> ??
>
> Do you mean there is a license and notice checked in, but the built jar
> ignores these and uses something different instead? That sounds like the
> worst of both worlds to me. It would:
> (a) double the work, as *both* need to be checked for correctness, and
> (b) is really confusing for users if they differ.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by simon <si...@chello.at>.
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:52 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > As it happens, there is quite a vigorous discussion going on right now
> > in both apache commons and legal-discuss lists regarding NOTICE and
> > LICENSE files. Some people would like to use a maven feature to
> > auto-generate LICENSE and NOTICE files. This is quite controversial,
> > though, and a number of people prefer the existing apache-commons way
> > (including myself).
>
> I like having them in the root folder, like done in Trinidad
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
>
> but, the auto-generation plugins is fine for including them in
> every JAR. Trinidad uses that plugin as well.
??
Do you mean there is a license and notice checked in, but the built jar
ignores these and uses something different instead? That sounds like the
worst of both worlds to me. It would:
(a) double the work, as *both* need to be checked for correctness, and
(b) is really confusing for users if they differ.
Regards,
Simon
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> As it happens, there is quite a vigorous discussion going on right now
> in both apache commons and legal-discuss lists regarding NOTICE and
> LICENSE files. Some people would like to use a maven feature to
> auto-generate LICENSE and NOTICE files. This is quite controversial,
> though, and a number of people prefer the existing apache-commons way
> (including myself).
I like having them in the root folder, like done in Trinidad
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
but, the auto-generation plugins is fine for including them in
every JAR. Trinidad uses that plugin as well.
-M
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by simon <si...@chello.at>.
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 20:55 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have done the release procedure again including
>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-plugin-parent</artifactId>
>
> For resolve MYFACES-1790 and moved LICENSE and NOTICE to META-INF
> folder for both myfaces api and impl.
The convention used in apache commons is that each module has a
LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt file in its root directory, ie next to the
pom.xml file and then they are output into the jar using a resource
definition in the pom:
<resource>
<directory>.</directory>
<targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
<includes>
<include>NOTICE.txt</include>
<include>LICENSE.txt</include>
</includes>
</resource>
This means that people who check out the code (or browse the repository
online) see the LICENSE and NOTICE in the obvious place (first dir that
anyone sees), but the jar has it in *its* obvious place (with the rest
of the jar meta-data). Having the NOTICE in the module root dir also
means developers are more likely to keep it up-to-date if adding code
with special license conditions.
I would highly recommend using this approach for myfaces too. But it's
not a release-blocker IMO, as the license/notice *are* in svn and in the
jar.
As it happens, there is quite a vigorous discussion going on right now
in both apache commons and legal-discuss lists regarding NOTICE and
LICENSE files. Some people would like to use a maven feature to
auto-generate LICENSE and NOTICE files. This is quite controversial,
though, and a number of people prefer the existing apache-commons way
(including myself).
Regards,
Simon
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I have done the release procedure again including
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-plugin-parent</artifactId>
For resolve MYFACES-1790 and moved LICENSE and NOTICE to META-INF
folder for both myfaces api and impl.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Dec 19, 2007 11:39 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, i will put NOTICE and LICENSE on META-INF.
cool! check the suggested maven-plugin;
late here in my timezone, I can help on that front
tomorrow.
>
> About MYFACES-1790, yes I noted this change on trunk:
>
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-faces-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </plugin>
>
> for include this on this release we have to release this project too
correct, but I am not sure if that is a blocker :-)
1.2.5 worked in the past, this bug was logged today;
I am cool with a 1.2.2 very soon ;-)
thanks for the work, so far!!
-M
,
> At start, for avoid this I switch back to 1.2.5 but if this is necessary
> I'm not have problem to run the release procedure again. I'm on it.
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Ok, i will put NOTICE and LICENSE on META-INF.
About MYFACES-1790, yes I noted this change on trunk:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-faces-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6-SNAPSHOT</version>
</plugin>
for include this on this release we have to release this project too,
At start, for avoid this I switch back to 1.2.5 but if this is necessary
I'm not have problem to run the release procedure again. I'm on it.
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Dec 19, 2007 11:31 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> As I said; no vetos.
> but we (Trinidad) got -1 and we were suggested to place them into
> META-INF
during incubation; I learned a lot there. Even I was already
around Apache years before
-M
>
> That's what the maven-remote-resources-plugin does as well.
>
> @Leonardo: did you use this plugin? Check the Trinidad profiles,
> for the best version; they help a lot.
>
> I really appreciate this release, since it is very good
> (replacement of JARs w/ RI is possible), but I prefer
> the files to be in META-INF...
>
> Perhaps it is only me :-)
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:23 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure where you're getting your information from. See [1] for
> > instructions on where and how to apply license and NOTICE files.
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > -1
> > > the license/notice files are not located in META-INF
> > > but they are in the JAR, that's right. But they should be placed
> > > in META-INF.
> > >
> > > not sure if MYFACES-1790 is a showstopper.
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP.
> > > > Did you notice that ?
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe < lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> > > > > MyFaces core out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> > > > > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> > > > > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core " v1.2.1 [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> > > > > +1 votes (see [3]).
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > released,
> > > > > and why..............
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Leonardo Uribe
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> > > > > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
As I said; no vetos.
but we (Trinidad) got -1 and we were suggested to place them into
META-INF
That's what the maven-remote-resources-plugin does as well.
@Leonardo: did you use this plugin? Check the Trinidad profiles,
for the best version; they help a lot.
I really appreciate this release, since it is very good
(replacement of JARs w/ RI is possible), but I prefer
the files to be in META-INF...
Perhaps it is only me :-)
On Dec 19, 2007 11:23 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure where you're getting your information from. See [1] for
> instructions on where and how to apply license and NOTICE files.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
>
>
>
> On 12/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > -1
> > the license/notice files are not located in META-INF
> > but they are in the JAR, that's right. But they should be placed
> > in META-INF.
> >
> > not sure if MYFACES-1790 is a showstopper.
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP.
> > > Did you notice that ?
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe < lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> > > > MyFaces core out.
> > > >
> > > > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> > > > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> > > > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core " v1.2.1 [1]
> > > >
> > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
> > > >
> > > > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> > > > +1 votes (see [3]).
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> > > > and why..............
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Leonardo Uribe
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> > > > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure where you're getting your information from. See [1] for
instructions on where and how to apply license and NOTICE files.
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
On 12/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> -1
> the license/notice files are not located in META-INF
> but they are in the JAR, that's right. But they should be placed
> in META-INF.
>
> not sure if MYFACES-1790 is a showstopper.
>
> -M
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP.
> > Did you notice that ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> > > MyFaces core out.
> > >
> > > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> > > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> > > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
> > >
> > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
> > >
> > > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> > > +1 votes (see [3]).
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> > > and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Leonardo Uribe
> > >
> > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> > > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
-1
the license/notice files are not located in META-INF
but they are in the JAR, that's right. But they should be placed
in META-INF.
not sure if MYFACES-1790 is a showstopper.
-M
On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP.
> Did you notice that ?
>
> -M
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> > MyFaces core out.
> >
> > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
> >
> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> >
> > Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
> >
> > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> > +1 votes (see [3]).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leonardo Uribe
> >
> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I updated the dependency of the mfp to 126-SNAP.
Did you notice that ?
-M
On Dec 19, 2007 8:49 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> MyFaces core out.
>
> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
>
> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
>
> Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> +1 votes (see [3]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Dec 19, 2007 11:16 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually the guidelines for Release Voting [1] make no stipulation on the
> detail of inspection. I performed a cursory inspection and compared the
> contents and layout to previous release stagings. I am using this current
> version in three projects without issue, so at a functional level I believe
> this release to be ready.
>
> I admittedly have not double checked the checksums or MANIFEST files, but
> from a license perspective we cleared up all those issues quite a while ago.
>
> My vote stands.
... and it is up to the release mgr to accept a -1 or not.
There are no vetos;
Since I care on the right location of license/notice files, I voted -1
(that means like I am not supporting the release as it is today)
not sure what went wrong in this release,
since the 1.2.0 and the 1.1.x license/notice files were OK
-M
>
>
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
>
>
>
> On 12/19/07, simon <simon.kitching@chello.at > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:54 -0800, Grant Smith wrote:
> > > +1
> >
> > That was very quick, Grant!
> >
> > Have you really inspected all the artifacts Leonardo created to see if
> > they are right? Licenses need to be correct, MANIFEST files should be
> > double-checked, checksums verified, etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
Actually the guidelines for Release Voting [1] make no stipulation on the
detail of inspection. I performed a cursory inspection and compared the
contents and layout to previous release stagings. I am using this current
version in three projects without issue, so at a functional level I believe
this release to be ready.
I admittedly have not double checked the checksums or MANIFEST files, but
from a license perspective we cleared up all those issues quite a while ago.
My vote stands.
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
On 12/19/07, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:54 -0800, Grant Smith wrote:
> > +1
>
> That was very quick, Grant!
>
> Have you really inspected all the artifacts Leonardo created to see if
> they are right? Licenses need to be correct, MANIFEST files should be
> double-checked, checksums verified, etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
tested Trinidad 12x trunk against it.
Fine so far!
On Dec 20, 2007 7:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for replacing the bits.
>
> +1
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 9:13 PM, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:54 -0800, Grant Smith wrote:
> > > +1
> >
> > That was very quick, Grant!
> >
> > Have you really inspected all the artifacts Leonardo created to see if
> > they are right? Licenses need to be correct, MANIFEST files should be
> > double-checked, checksums verified, etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Thanks for replacing the bits.
+1
-Matthias
On Dec 19, 2007 9:13 PM, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:54 -0800, Grant Smith wrote:
> > +1
>
> That was very quick, Grant!
>
> Have you really inspected all the artifacts Leonardo created to see if
> they are right? Licenses need to be correct, MANIFEST files should be
> double-checked, checksums verified, etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by simon <si...@chello.at>.
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:54 -0800, Grant Smith wrote:
> +1
That was very quick, Grant!
Have you really inspected all the artifacts Leonardo created to see if
they are right? Licenses need to be correct, MANIFEST files should be
double-checked, checksums verified, etc.
Regards,
Simon
Re: [Vote] release for myfaces 1.2.1
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 12/19/07, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of Apache
> MyFaces core out.
>
> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v3.0.1 [1]
> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v1.2.1 [1]
>
> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
>
> Please take a look at the "1.2.0" artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> +1 votes (see [3]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces121
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
--
Grant Smith