You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-dev@db.apache.org by "Thomas Dudziak (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2005/04/12 23:15:17 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (OJB-19) OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that do not specify a collection class
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-19?page=history ]
Thomas Dudziak resolved OJB-19:
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 1.0.x CVS
(was: 1.0.4)
> OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that do not specify a collection class
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OJB-19
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-19
> Project: OJB
> Type: Bug
> Components: PB-API
> Versions: 1.0.3
> Reporter: Thomas Dudziak
> Assignee: Thomas Dudziak
> Fix For: 1.0.x CVS
>
> In cases where the collection-descriptor of a field of type List/Set does not specify collection-class, OJB currently uses RemovalAwareCollection which is a List but not a Set.
> Instead, OJB should use the field type, and either throw a metadata exception if none of the default collection classes can be assigned to it, or use a fitting default collection.
> This also means that a RemovalAwareSet is needed (based upon ManageableHashSet).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org