[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CAMEL-3901) Create a separate component for camel transport for cxf

["Willem Jiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13025578#comment-13025578 ] 

Willem Jiang edited comment on CAMEL-3901 at 4/27/11 3:06 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

+1 for pulling the camel transport for CXF out of camel-cxf component.
It will help camel-cxf supports the CXF 2.3.x and CXF 2.4.x better.
I think it should be OK if camel-cxf module had no dependency of camel transport, as camel-cxf should not touch the transport part directly.


      was (Author: njiang):
    +1 for pulling the camel transport for CXF out of camel-cxf component.
I think it should be OK if camel-cxf module had no dependency of camel transport, as camel-cxf should not touch the transport part directly.

  
> Create a separate component for camel transport for cxf
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-3901
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3901
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-cxf
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Christian Schneider
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: camel-3901-1.patch, camel-3901-camel transport-for-cxf.png
>
>
> The camel-cxf component curently contains too many unrelated functions. It contains:
> - camel transport for cxf
> - cxf component
> - cxfbean component
> - cxfrs componet
> - converters
> So this causes the code of the component to depend on each other and suck in much too many dependencies. Besides this there are some package dependency cycles in the code which could easily be solved.
> A first step is to separate the camel transport for cxf from the rest of the code. It is independent of all other code and can be pulled into a new component. 
> Some advantages are: 
> - The camel transport for cxf needs very few dependencies so it is a vey light weight aproach to combine cxf and camel
> - The new component nicely shows how to bridge between cxd and camel without the overhead of the other components
> - We can let the camel-cxf component depdend on the camel transport for cxf so for people using maven no changes are needed
> I will attach a patch where I simply deleted anything that is not relevant for camel transport for cxf from the camel-cxf project. This is of course not yet the solution but it shows how small the new component will be and is a good start for doing the split.
> I would be very interested about opinions from other developers about the split.
> Christian
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira