Voting issues for this week

[Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>]

There are three issues for voting this week :

1) JSR-243: JDO 2 - final review.  I already voted yes with the 
following statement :

   Apache is proud to be a supporter of what might actually be the first
   JSR implemented with full community transparency and a permissive
   open-source license for the RI and the TCK.  We respectfully note that
   the sky hasn't fallen.

This was our own JDO podling (now in DB) and the RI is jpox and the TCK 
is from here under AL 2.0.

2) JSR-291 : Dynamic Component Support aka OSGi : we have interest from 
Felix and Directory to participate.  We need to bring this to closure.

3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note that Sun 
has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just 
dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope we can 
find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.


geir

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

Heh, Torsten was the person I was thinking of when you asked, and then
his mail popped up.

+1

On a side note, the JCP page says James represents the ASF on JSR 241
(Groovy) as well as representing himself. That seems a bit unusual? I'm
not sure if that will overlap at all with this one, since they specify
the language, not how it is implemented, but they are still going to be
closely related.

- Brett

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> we have a victim^H^H^H^H^Holunteer!
> 
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>>>> 3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note
>>>>> that Sun
>>>>> has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just
>>>>> dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope we can
>>>>> find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.
>>
>> I might be interested in this one as well.
>>
>> cheers
>> -- 
>> Torsten
>>
> 

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>]

> we have a victim^H^H^H^H^Holunteer!

...

> Heh, Torsten was the person I was thinking of when you asked, and then
> his mail popped up.

Hehe ...well, alright :)

cheers
--
Torsten

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>]

we have a victim^H^H^H^H^Holunteer!

Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>>> 3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note that 
>>>> Sun
>>>> has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just
>>>> dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope we can
>>>> find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.
> 
> I might be interested in this one as well.
> 
> cheers
> -- 
> Torsten
> 

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>]

>>> 3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note  
>>> that Sun
>>> has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just
>>> dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope  
>>> we can
>>> find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.

I might be interested in this one as well.

cheers
--
Torsten

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>]

Brett Porter wrote:
> They all sound good. I'm be interested in joining a -discuss list for
> the second two once you find someone to rep.

Of course.  Any thoughts on someone we can draft for 292?

> 
> This is also a prod to those that said they wanted the list for 277 and
> still haven't signed up :) I need to make the list better known so we
> can actually start some discussions. There has been a flurry of material
> that I have not yet caught up with.
> 
> - Brett
> 
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> There are three issues for voting this week :
>>
>> 1) JSR-243: JDO 2 - final review.  I already voted yes with the
>> following statement :
>>
>>   Apache is proud to be a supporter of what might actually be the first
>>   JSR implemented with full community transparency and a permissive
>>   open-source license for the RI and the TCK.  We respectfully note that
>>   the sky hasn't fallen.
>>
>> This was our own JDO podling (now in DB) and the RI is jpox and the TCK
>> is from here under AL 2.0.
>>
>> 2) JSR-291 : Dynamic Component Support aka OSGi : we have interest from
>> Felix and Directory to participate.  We need to bring this to closure.
>>
>> 3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note that Sun
>> has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just
>> dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope we can
>> find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.
>>
>>
>> geir
>>
> 
> 

Re: Voting issues for this week

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

They all sound good. I'm be interested in joining a -discuss list for
the second two once you find someone to rep.

This is also a prod to those that said they wanted the list for 277 and
still haven't signed up :) I need to make the list better known so we
can actually start some discussions. There has been a flurry of material
that I have not yet caught up with.

- Brett

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> There are three issues for voting this week :
> 
> 1) JSR-243: JDO 2 - final review.  I already voted yes with the
> following statement :
> 
>   Apache is proud to be a supporter of what might actually be the first
>   JSR implemented with full community transparency and a permissive
>   open-source license for the RI and the TCK.  We respectfully note that
>   the sky hasn't fallen.
> 
> This was our own JDO podling (now in DB) and the RI is jpox and the TCK
> is from here under AL 2.0.
> 
> 2) JSR-291 : Dynamic Component Support aka OSGi : we have interest from
> Felix and Directory to participate.  We need to bring this to closure.
> 
> 3) JSR-292 : Supporting Dynamically Typed Languages : I'll note that Sun
> has this wrong in the title - it's about dynamic languages, not just
> dynamically typed.  I have no problem supporting this, and hope we can
> find someone w/ a clue to participate on our behalf.
> 
> 
> geir
>