[jira] Closed: (XERCESC-1552) Relative capability, language and version number questions

["David Bertoni (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=all ]
     
David Bertoni closed XERCESC-1552:
----------------------------------


> Relative capability, language and version number questions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: XERCESC-1552
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
>      Project: Xerces-C++
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Miscellaneous
>     Versions: 2.7.0
>  Environment: Solaris
>     Reporter: David G. Pickett
>     Priority: Minor

>
> We are planning to do a project using Xerces.  It is a bit confusing that the level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify.  It feels like J2 is the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less.  But then, the version numbers are just a minor point apart.  Is this a red herring, or are the product actually verey comparable?
> The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
> It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit challenging.  Are the two products marching in different directions?
> Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know version?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org