You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com> on 2002/11/08 21:02:28 UTC
id attribute ignored in
validation didn't varf on
<note id="Podling">
but neither did it get rendered into an anchor..
which should have happened?
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Jeff Turner wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > validation didn't varf on
> >
> > <note id="Podling">
> >
> > but neither did it get rendered into an anchor..
> >
> > which should have happened?
>
> Exactly that..
okey. sorry, my last line was unclear; it should have been
'which one should have happened?' i wasn't making any assumptions.
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@indexgeo.com.au>.
Jeff Turner wrote:
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > validation didn't varf on
> >
> > <note id="Podling">
> >
> > but neither did it get rendered into an anchor..
> >
> > which should have happened?
>
> Exactly that..
>
> Everyone: the DTD allows @id on any element, but the stylesheet only
> generates <a name="..."> for <section>'s. Would anyone object if I
> generalize the stylesheet rule so <a name="..."/> is created for every
> @id below <body>?
Do it.
--David
Posted by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> validation didn't varf on
>
> <note id="Podling">
>
> but neither did it get rendered into an anchor..
>
> which should have happened?
Exactly that..
Everyone: the DTD allows @id on any element, but the stylesheet only
generates <a name="..."> for <section>'s. Would anyone object if I
generalize the stylesheet rule so <a name="..."/> is created for every
@id below <body>?
Proposed patch for forrest-site attached.
--Jeff
Re: id attribute ignored in
Posted by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> validation didn't varf on
>
> <note id="Podling">
>
> but neither did it get rendered into an anchor..
>
> which should have happened?
.. so in case you missed the commit log, all ids below <body> are now
rendered as anchors.
--Jeff