You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com> on 2010/04/22 21:51:39 UTC

InheritableThreadLocal holder for Application class

Hi!
Is there any particular reason why Application class wouldn't be stored in
InheritableThreadLocal instead of ThreadLocal? The problem is that I need to
be able to access Application class from a thread created when a button is
pressed. Using InheritableThreadLocal instead of ThreadLocal would solve
this problem. What do you think?

Alex

Re: InheritableThreadLocal holder for Application class

Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.

For those who may see this thread in the future, this was resolved:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2846
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2846>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=938140

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi!
> Is there any particular reason why Application class wouldn't be stored in
> InheritableThreadLocal instead of ThreadLocal? The problem is that I need
> to
> be able to access Application class from a thread created when a button is
> pressed. Using InheritableThreadLocal instead of ThreadLocal would solve
> this problem. What do you think?
>
> Alex
>