You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@mxnet.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/08/30 12:42:19 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] KellenSunderland commented on issue #11795: Fix problematic backward of take & embedding

KellenSunderland commented on issue #11795: Fix problematic backward of take & embedding
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11795#issuecomment-526586799
 
 
   Could be a valid point Xingjian.  Are you seeing differences when measured
   with nvprof?  Can you post a summary?
   
   On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 8:45 AM Xingjian Shi <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > I find the previous performance test was conducted using time.time(). It’s
   > not safe to do that due to the tremendous overhead of the imperative API in
   > MXNet. We should rely on nvprof in the future.
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11795?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABYZGE5LIWKYDBHYIQHFJE3QGP3BDA5CNFSM4FKPUUDKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5EYSTQ#issuecomment-524912974>,
   > or mute the thread
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYZGEYRTSCQE3Q55QNSOH3QGP3BDANCNFSM4FKPUUDA>
   > .
   >
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services