You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Benjamin Bentmann <be...@udo.edu> on 2013/02/12 23:01:55 UTC

Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

Dennis Lundberg wrote:

> "ExecuteJava" daemon prio=6 tid=0x0000000006a92790 nid=0x1078 waiting on
> condition [0x000000000a63e000..0x000000000a63fa10]
>          at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>          at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:118)
>          at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:716)
>          at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:872)
>          at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1179)
>          at
> java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:199)
>          at
> org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:528)

Unless the decision gets made to require Java 1.6 for Maven 3.1+, I 
suggest to revert 1a1fe6d50802713d969ed08d6fa06dec53cf90e9, thereby 
allowing the thread pool to actually process its work queue.


Benjamin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

Posted by Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com>.
I now have a "real" windows pc to test that on - so I'll give it a spin
before reverting/fixing.

Kristian


2013/2/12 Benjamin Bentmann <be...@udo.edu>

> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>  "ExecuteJava" daemon prio=6 tid=0x0000000006a92790 nid=0x1078 waiting on
>> condition [0x000000000a63e000..**0x000000000a63fa10]
>>          at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>          at java.util.concurrent.locks.**LockSupport.park(LockSupport.**
>> java:118)
>>          at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**
>> parkAndCheckInterrupt(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:716)
>>          at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**
>> doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:872)
>>          at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**
>> acquireSharedInterruptibly(**AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.**java:1179)
>>          at
>> java.util.concurrent.**CountDownLatch.await(**CountDownLatch.java:199)
>>          at
>> org.apache.maven.artifact.**resolver.**DefaultArtifactResolver.**resolve(
>> **DefaultArtifactResolver.java:**528)
>>
>
> Unless the decision gets made to require Java 1.6 for Maven 3.1+, I
> suggest to revert 1a1fe6d50802713d969ed08d6fa06d**ec53cf90e9, thereby
> allowing the thread pool to actually process its work queue.
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<de...@maven.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>