[GitHub] [iceberg] aokolnychyi commented on pull request #6651: Spark 3.3 write to branch snapshot

["aokolnychyi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

aokolnychyi commented on PR #6651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6651#issuecomment-1449274994

   > To get this working in other situations, I think we should go back to the original idea of using the branch name in the table identifier, like catalog.db.table.branch. While that's not ideal for column references (by default columns would be branch.col rather than table.col) it is the most reliable solution for writes, reads, and dynamic pruning.
   
   What about using the exact same syntax we support for reads? I believe it would be `catalog.db.table.branch_{NAME}`?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org