You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2015/04/15 18:27:05 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Vote passed with:
11 +1 binding votes
2 +1 non-binding votes
After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
start on the IP clearance.
-Alex
On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>+1
>
>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it
>>is:
>>
>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found
>>here
>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content will
>>be
>> donated.
>>
>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins will
>>send
>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we can
>>start
>> the IP Clearance process.
>>
>> Here’s my +1.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
I don't think it really offers us much advantage at the moment. Because of
the size of our site (mainly because of asdocs), it will add a lot of bloat
everytime we publish a new Flex version...
-Nick
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> > gets pub’d?
> >
> >
> Just saw this notification:
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available
> Infra now supports git based website publication.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> gets pub’d?
>
>
Just saw this notification:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available
Infra now supports git based website publication.
Thanks,
Om
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> The files are in our svn in a branch. Are you saying some XML files were
> missing from the donation?
>
Yes, the missing aspx files, ex:
http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx
A cached version from 2012 is available here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120502064410/http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses-xml.aspx
If you look at the 'View Source' on that page, there is a piece of xml
<data>...</data> which is what powers the chart examples at examples such
as:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568f-7ffc.html
>
> -Alex
>
> On 8/12/15, 12:01 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Do we know what the status of this is?
> >
> >I have managed to find out data used in the Chart examples from the
> >web.archive.org backups. I have them on my local box as xml files. What
> >would be the next steps?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the
> >>content
> >> >and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay
> >>tuned.
> >>
> >> OK, here’s the list. Of course, these may not all be there after Nick’s
> >> edits. And if something isn’t in the list, feel free to ask or try to
> >>see
> >> if a pattern applies. One interesting tidbit I learned: You aren’t
> >> supposed to use apostrophe’s with trademarks.
> >>
> >> Flash 8 -> Flash Professional 8
> >> Flash 9 -> Flash Professional 9
> >> Flash ActionScript -> ActionScript language for Flash Player
> >> Flash ActiveX -> Flash Player ActiveX
> >> Flash HTML text fields -> Flash Player text fields that display HTML
> >> Flash IDE -> Flash Professional
> >> Flash SWF -> SWF
> >> Flex and Flash UI components -> UI components for the Flex SDK or Flash
> >> Player
> >> Flash UnicodeTable -> UnicodeTable in Flash Player.
> >> Flash Video -> FLV file or video for Flash Player
> >> Adobe Flash and Flex Objects -> Adobe Flash Pro and Flex Objects
> >> FLA file in Flash and ensure -> FLA file in Flash Professional and
> >>ensure
> >> between Flash and the server -> between Flash Player and the server
> >> Flash application -> application for Flash Player
> >> Flash applications -> applications for Flash Player
> >> Flash classes -> classes provided by the Flash Player
> >> JavaScript to Flash communication -> JavaScript to ActionScript
> >> communication
> >> Flash communications applications -> communications applications for the
> >> Flash Player
> >> Flash content -> content for Flash Player
> >> Flash displays -> Flash Player displays
> >> When a Flash document -> When a document in Flash
> >> Flash does not export -> Flash Professional does not export
> >> Flash drawing API -> Flash Player drawing API
> >> sales of Flex and Flash for -> sales of Flex and Flash Professional for
> >> SWF file in Flash -> SWF file in the Flash Player
> >> Flash includes -> The Flash Player includes
> >> fonts in Flash is -> fonts in Flash Professional is
> >> create in Flash or -> create in Flash Professional
> >> Flash player -> Flash Player
> >> the Flash plug-in -> the Flash Player plug-in
> >> into Flash presentations -> into SWF or FLV presentations
> >> FXG to Flash primitives -> FXG to Flash Player primitives
> >> built with Flash share -> built with Flash Professional share
> >> In Flash terminology, “hot tracked” -> In terminology relating to Flash,
> >> “hot tracked”
> >> the Flash timeline concept -> the timeline concept in Flash Pro
> >>(Player?)
> >> that Flash uses -> that is used in Flash Player and Flash Professional
> >> Flash would throw -> Flash Player would throw
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The files are in our svn in a branch. Are you saying some XML files were
missing from the donation?
-Alex
On 8/12/15, 12:01 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>Do we know what the status of this is?
>
>I have managed to find out data used in the Chart examples from the
>web.archive.org backups. I have them on my local box as xml files. What
>would be the next steps?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the
>>content
>> >and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay
>>tuned.
>>
>> OK, here’s the list. Of course, these may not all be there after Nick’s
>> edits. And if something isn’t in the list, feel free to ask or try to
>>see
>> if a pattern applies. One interesting tidbit I learned: You aren’t
>> supposed to use apostrophe’s with trademarks.
>>
>> Flash 8 -> Flash Professional 8
>> Flash 9 -> Flash Professional 9
>> Flash ActionScript -> ActionScript language for Flash Player
>> Flash ActiveX -> Flash Player ActiveX
>> Flash HTML text fields -> Flash Player text fields that display HTML
>> Flash IDE -> Flash Professional
>> Flash SWF -> SWF
>> Flex and Flash UI components -> UI components for the Flex SDK or Flash
>> Player
>> Flash UnicodeTable -> UnicodeTable in Flash Player.
>> Flash Video -> FLV file or video for Flash Player
>> Adobe Flash and Flex Objects -> Adobe Flash Pro and Flex Objects
>> FLA file in Flash and ensure -> FLA file in Flash Professional and
>>ensure
>> between Flash and the server -> between Flash Player and the server
>> Flash application -> application for Flash Player
>> Flash applications -> applications for Flash Player
>> Flash classes -> classes provided by the Flash Player
>> JavaScript to Flash communication -> JavaScript to ActionScript
>> communication
>> Flash communications applications -> communications applications for the
>> Flash Player
>> Flash content -> content for Flash Player
>> Flash displays -> Flash Player displays
>> When a Flash document -> When a document in Flash
>> Flash does not export -> Flash Professional does not export
>> Flash drawing API -> Flash Player drawing API
>> sales of Flex and Flash for -> sales of Flex and Flash Professional for
>> SWF file in Flash -> SWF file in the Flash Player
>> Flash includes -> The Flash Player includes
>> fonts in Flash is -> fonts in Flash Professional is
>> create in Flash or -> create in Flash Professional
>> Flash player -> Flash Player
>> the Flash plug-in -> the Flash Player plug-in
>> into Flash presentations -> into SWF or FLV presentations
>> FXG to Flash primitives -> FXG to Flash Player primitives
>> built with Flash share -> built with Flash Professional share
>> In Flash terminology, “hot tracked” -> In terminology relating to Flash,
>> “hot tracked”
>> the Flash timeline concept -> the timeline concept in Flash Pro
>>(Player?)
>> that Flash uses -> that is used in Flash Player and Flash Professional
>> Flash would throw -> Flash Player would throw
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Do we know what the status of this is?
I have managed to find out data used in the Chart examples from the
web.archive.org backups. I have them on my local box as xml files. What
would be the next steps?
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> >I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the content
> >and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay tuned.
>
> OK, here’s the list. Of course, these may not all be there after Nick’s
> edits. And if something isn’t in the list, feel free to ask or try to see
> if a pattern applies. One interesting tidbit I learned: You aren’t
> supposed to use apostrophe’s with trademarks.
>
> Flash 8 -> Flash Professional 8
> Flash 9 -> Flash Professional 9
> Flash ActionScript -> ActionScript language for Flash Player
> Flash ActiveX -> Flash Player ActiveX
> Flash HTML text fields -> Flash Player text fields that display HTML
> Flash IDE -> Flash Professional
> Flash SWF -> SWF
> Flex and Flash UI components -> UI components for the Flex SDK or Flash
> Player
> Flash UnicodeTable -> UnicodeTable in Flash Player.
> Flash Video -> FLV file or video for Flash Player
> Adobe Flash and Flex Objects -> Adobe Flash Pro and Flex Objects
> FLA file in Flash and ensure -> FLA file in Flash Professional and ensure
> between Flash and the server -> between Flash Player and the server
> Flash application -> application for Flash Player
> Flash applications -> applications for Flash Player
> Flash classes -> classes provided by the Flash Player
> JavaScript to Flash communication -> JavaScript to ActionScript
> communication
> Flash communications applications -> communications applications for the
> Flash Player
> Flash content -> content for Flash Player
> Flash displays -> Flash Player displays
> When a Flash document -> When a document in Flash
> Flash does not export -> Flash Professional does not export
> Flash drawing API -> Flash Player drawing API
> sales of Flex and Flash for -> sales of Flex and Flash Professional for
> SWF file in Flash -> SWF file in the Flash Player
> Flash includes -> The Flash Player includes
> fonts in Flash is -> fonts in Flash Professional is
> create in Flash or -> create in Flash Professional
> Flash player -> Flash Player
> the Flash plug-in -> the Flash Player plug-in
> into Flash presentations -> into SWF or FLV presentations
> FXG to Flash primitives -> FXG to Flash Player primitives
> built with Flash share -> built with Flash Professional share
> In Flash terminology, “hot tracked” -> In terminology relating to Flash,
> “hot tracked”
> the Flash timeline concept -> the timeline concept in Flash Pro (Player?)
> that Flash uses -> that is used in Flash Player and Flash Professional
> Flash would throw -> Flash Player would throw
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/29/15, 2:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the content
>and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay tuned.
OK, here’s the list. Of course, these may not all be there after Nick’s
edits. And if something isn’t in the list, feel free to ask or try to see
if a pattern applies. One interesting tidbit I learned: You aren’t
supposed to use apostrophe’s with trademarks.
Flash 8 -> Flash Professional 8
Flash 9 -> Flash Professional 9
Flash ActionScript -> ActionScript language for Flash Player
Flash ActiveX -> Flash Player ActiveX
Flash HTML text fields -> Flash Player text fields that display HTML
Flash IDE -> Flash Professional
Flash SWF -> SWF
Flex and Flash UI components -> UI components for the Flex SDK or Flash
Player
Flash UnicodeTable -> UnicodeTable in Flash Player.
Flash Video -> FLV file or video for Flash Player
Adobe Flash and Flex Objects -> Adobe Flash Pro and Flex Objects
FLA file in Flash and ensure -> FLA file in Flash Professional and ensure
between Flash and the server -> between Flash Player and the server
Flash application -> application for Flash Player
Flash applications -> applications for Flash Player
Flash classes -> classes provided by the Flash Player
JavaScript to Flash communication -> JavaScript to ActionScript
communication
Flash communications applications -> communications applications for the
Flash Player
Flash content -> content for Flash Player
Flash displays -> Flash Player displays
When a Flash document -> When a document in Flash
Flash does not export -> Flash Professional does not export
Flash drawing API -> Flash Player drawing API
sales of Flex and Flash for -> sales of Flex and Flash Professional for
SWF file in Flash -> SWF file in the Flash Player
Flash includes -> The Flash Player includes
fonts in Flash is -> fonts in Flash Professional is
create in Flash or -> create in Flash Professional
Flash player -> Flash Player
the Flash plug-in -> the Flash Player plug-in
into Flash presentations -> into SWF or FLV presentations
FXG to Flash primitives -> FXG to Flash Player primitives
built with Flash share -> built with Flash Professional share
In Flash terminology, “hot tracked” -> In terminology relating to Flash,
“hot tracked”
the Flash timeline concept -> the timeline concept in Flash Pro (Player?)
that Flash uses -> that is used in Flash Player and Flash Professional
Flash would throw -> Flash Player would throw
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/29/15, 2:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>HI,
>
>> Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like
>>“Flash
>> content” as a requirement before publication.
>
>Dos that mean they it needs to be done after publication or do they don't
>care at all?
Well, yes it needs to be done. Don’t know if someone is going to be
watching over our shoulder and how often they are going to check. It
probably isn’t a high priority, but Adobe must defend the integrity of the
mark.
I’ve been asked to supply a list of the ways Flash is used in the content
and will supposedly receive a set of replacement phrases, so stay tuned.
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like “Flash
> content” as a requirement before publication.
Dos that mean they it needs to be done after publication or do they don't care at all?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/28/15, 8:30 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash
>>>>content”
>>>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>>>
>>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe
>>>Flash"
>>> in the list on some pages.
>>
>I’ve asked Adobe Legal to see how important it is to fix these issues
>before publication. If you want to start in on it, please coordinate with
>Nick. This is SVN and having two people edit the file can cause merge
>hell. I’d rather get something published for our community sooner and fix
>things that can wait later.
Our legal folks currently do not see the cleaning up of terms like “Flash
content” as a requirement before publication.
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content”
>>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>>
>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe
>>Flash"
>> in the list on some pages.
>
>Well Adobe not following their own trademark usage may be OK - they are
>probably not going to sue themselves for trademark infringement :-) It
>may be easier just changing the wording as it’s only in 2 or 3 places.
I think I found lots more than 2 or 3. I left “Adobe Flash” in the
trademark list on pages where “Flash” is used not in conjunction with
other words “Flash Platform” or “Flash Player” so that can help anyone who
wants to do these edits find places to look, but I could certainly have
missed some. I think I saw Flash IDE and Flash Video File. And places
where the word “Adobe” and TM and R might need to be added.
I’ve asked Adobe Legal to see how important it is to fix these issues
before publication. If you want to start in on it, please coordinate with
Nick. This is SVN and having two people edit the file can cause merge
hell. I’d rather get something published for our community sooner and fix
things that can wait later.
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
>> Should be “LifeCycle":
>> grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
>
> Didn’t understand this.
Very minor - the “I” should be a ”i”.
> I’ll leave these for someone else to determine if they can be replaced
> with Apache Flex. If any can’t be then we’ll add Adobe Flex to the list.
Sounds reasonable.
>> Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content”
>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>
> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe Flash"
> in the list on some pages.
Well Adobe not following their own trademark usage may be OK - they are probably not going to sue themselves for trademark infringement :-) It may be easier just changing the wording as it’s only in 2 or 3 places.
> That may not be the correct interpretation. Since I have to ask Legal
> about the usage of “Flash content” etc, I’ll ask for a clarification on
> this attribution.
According to legal advice (from a firm specialising in IP/Trademark law) I’ve received it is, but as they say your millage may vary.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I just committed a bunch of updates to the trademark lists. Thanks Justin
for finding these.
On 4/27/15, 3:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
>
>grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I replaced Nokia with Flex just for now. We can’t use the images anyway
so Nick or someone will have to cook up a modified example.
>
>Should be “LifeCycle":
>grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Didn’t understand this.
>
>
>Perhaps these:
>grep "Adobe Flex" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I’ll leave these for someone else to determine if they can be replaced
with Apache Flex. If any can’t be then we’ll add Adobe Flex to the list.
>grep “Blaze" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
>
>Perhaps these as well:
>grep “Flash Platform" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
>grep “Flash Player" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Added all three.
>
>I’m not 100% how they need to be handled. [1] probably contains the
>answer.
>
>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content”
>are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe Flash"
in the list on some pages.
>
>I’d also like to point out that the trademark attribution is non standard
>and contains an extra bit "No other license to the Adobe trademarks are
>granted.” The result of which is that we need to be careful when editing
>the trademarks and may in fact require permission from Adobe in order to
>do so.
That may not be the correct interpretation. Since I have to ask Legal
about the usage of “Flash content” etc, I’ll ask for a clarification on
this attribution.
-Alex
>
>1.
>http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/documents/Flash_Trad
>emark_Guidelines_3rd_Party_2014.pdf
AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
I think the product name of Adobes "BlazeDS Professional/Enterprise" is LiveCycle
Chris
________________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. April 2015 00:41
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Hi,
There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Should be “LifeCycle":
grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps these:
grep "Adobe Flex" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
grep “Blaze" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps these as well:
grep “Flash Platform" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
grep “Flash Player" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I’m not 100% how they need to be handled. [1] probably contains the answer.
Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content” are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
I’d also like to point out that the trademark attribution is non standard and contains an extra bit "No other license to the Adobe trademarks are granted.” The result of which is that we need to be careful when editing the trademarks and may in fact require permission from Adobe in order to do so.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/documents/Flash_Trademark_Guidelines_3rd_Party_2014.pdf
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Should be “LifeCycle":
grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps these:
grep "Adobe Flex" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
grep “Blaze" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
Perhaps these as well:
grep “Flash Platform" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
grep “Flash Player" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I’m not 100% how they need to be handled. [1] probably contains the answer.
Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content” are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
I’d also like to point out that the trademark attribution is non standard and contains an extra bit "No other license to the Adobe trademarks are granted.” The result of which is that we need to be careful when editing the trademarks and may in fact require permission from Adobe in order to do so.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/documents/Flash_Trademark_Guidelines_3rd_Party_2014.pdf
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/30/15, 5:54 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>I image we can re-configure the applets to use .xml documents. From what
>I
>remember, 90% of them were calling web services anyway, so we should be
>able to get the same result.
OK. I know there is an employees.xml in the flex-external repo at
ADC/remotedata. Not sure if that will help or not.
@Nick, over in the Installer thread I’m trying to get a status on your
as3httpclient work. I’m willing to try to work on it so we can get
another Installer release out. Can you update us in that thread?
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
I image we can re-configure the applets to use .xml documents. From what I
remember, 90% of them were calling web services anyway, so we should be
able to get the same result.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
> >way to get an accurate count of how many.
> >
> >Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
> >them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
> >definitely save us a lot of time.
>
> The doc folks have looked around and can’t fine the asp code. We’ll have
> to re-create it ourselves. Can we just stick .json or .xml files on our
> site? Do we need an actual ASP server?
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> I have a pile of mxml files that look like they are safe to commit. Where
> should they go? SVN or Git?
A good place for them would be Tour De Flex and (eventually) have the content point to that.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I don’t know what is behind an asp site, but if it looks like code, it
will have to go through the donation process, I can’t just copy it over.
I’ll ask around, but even if there are dozens of apps and they all hit one
or two server calls, it will still be faster to adjust those dozen tests,
especially if you can use sed or something like that.
I have a pile of mxml files that look like they are safe to commit. Where
should they go? SVN or Git?
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
>way to get an accurate count of how many.
>
>Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
>them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
>definitely save us a lot of time.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Unless there are a lot of them, it will probably take less time to
>>replace
>> the data with local .xml files. Some of this stuff was created and
>> maintained by individuals and had no corporate backup.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/27/15, 2:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content
>> >from this server:
>> >http://aspexamples.adobe.com
>> >
>> >Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this
>>page:
>> >
>>
>>http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf656
>>8
>> >f-7ffc.html
>> >
>> >The swf file loads, tries to load something from
>> >http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails
>> >silently.
>> >
>> >It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well.
>>Although
>> >we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least
>> >able to reuse the content.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also
>>seems
>> >>to
>> >> prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
>> >> (site/branches/flexdocs).
>> >>
>> >> After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team
>>found a
>> >> folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the
>>.html
>> >> files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there
>>are
>> >> examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are
>> >>the
>> >> right files yet or not.
>> >>
>> >> My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up
>> >>against
>> >> the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html
>> >>files
>> >> into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to
>> >>commit
>> >> the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again.
>>Since we
>> >> were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this
>> >> folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but
>>only
>> >> for the ones I can prove match up.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
>> >> >
>> >> >-Nick
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only
>> >>trunk
>> >> >> gets pub’d?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project
>> >>get
>> >> >>put
>> >> >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from
>>being
>> >> >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open
>>up
>> >>a
>> >> >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going
>>so we
>> >> >>can
>> >> >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding,
>>the
>> >> >>more
>> >> >> >complex it is to find stuff :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >-Nick
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published?
>>What
>> >> >>folder
>> >> >> >> should be put it in?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the
>> >> >>wording
>> >> >> >>of
>> >> >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his
>> >>concern,
>> >> >>but
>> >> >> >>I
>> >> >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless
>>you
>> >> >>have a
>> >> >> >> window to work on it now.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is
>> >>where
>> >> >>it
>> >> >> >> >will
>> >> >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push
>>it
>> >> >> >>live...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >-Nick
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache.
>> >>I’m
>> >> >> >>ready
>> >> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
>> >> >> >>flex-utilities,
>> >> >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few
>>other
>> >> >> >>trademark
>> >> >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should
>> >>change to
>> >> >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
>> >> >> >>originals. So
>> >> >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >Vote passed with:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
>> >> >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded
>> >>so we
>> >> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >-Alex
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>+1
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE
>> >>thread,
>> >> >>so
>> >> >> >> >>here it
>> >> >> >> >> >>>is:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
>> >> >>content
>> >> >> >> >>found
>> >> >> >> >> >>>here
>> >> >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe
>> >>stuff
>> >> >>you
>> >> >> >>see
>> >> >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the
>>text
>> >> >>content
>> >> >> >> >>will
>> >> >> >> >> >>>be
>> >> >> >> >> >>> donated.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the
>>Adobe
>> >> >>admins
>> >> >> >> >>will
>> >> >> >> >> >>>send
>> >> >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and
>> >>then
>> >> >>we
>> >> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> >> >>>start
>> >> >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>__
>> >>>>>>_
>> >> >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>> >> >>Security.cloud
>> >> >> >> >> >>>service.
>> >> >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit
>> >> http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>__
>> >>>>>>_
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
> >way to get an accurate count of how many.
> >
> >Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
> >them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
> >definitely save us a lot of time.
>
> The doc folks have looked around and can’t fine the asp code. We’ll have
> to re-create it ourselves. Can we just stick .json or .xml files on our
> site? Do we need an actual ASP server?
>
>
It could be json or xml. AMF would be better ;-)
And no, it does not have to be an ASP server. We could just serve the
files off of a simple webserver.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/27/15, 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
>way to get an accurate count of how many.
>
>Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
>them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
>definitely save us a lot of time.
The doc folks have looked around and can’t fine the asp code. We’ll have
to re-create it ourselves. Can we just stick .json or .xml files on our
site? Do we need an actual ASP server?
-Alex
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a
way to get an accurate count of how many.
Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update
them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will
definitely save us a lot of time.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Unless there are a lot of them, it will probably take less time to replace
> the data with local .xml files. Some of this stuff was created and
> maintained by individuals and had no corporate backup.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/15, 2:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content
> >from this server:
> >http://aspexamples.adobe.com
> >
> >Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page:
> >
> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568
> >f-7ffc.html
> >
> >The swf file loads, tries to load something from
> >http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails
> >silently.
> >
> >It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well. Although
> >we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least
> >able to reuse the content.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems
> >>to
> >> prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
> >> (site/branches/flexdocs).
> >>
> >> After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a
> >> folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html
> >> files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are
> >> examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are
> >>the
> >> right files yet or not.
> >>
> >> My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up
> >>against
> >> the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html
> >>files
> >> into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to
> >>commit
> >> the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we
> >> were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this
> >> folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only
> >> for the ones I can prove match up.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
> >>
> >> >You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
> >> >
> >> >-Nick
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only
> >>trunk
> >> >> gets pub’d?
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project
> >>get
> >> >>put
> >> >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
> >> >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up
> >>a
> >> >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we
> >> >>can
> >> >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the
> >> >>more
> >> >> >complex it is to find stuff :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-Nick
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What
> >> >>folder
> >> >> >> should be put it in?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the
> >> >>wording
> >> >> >>of
> >> >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his
> >>concern,
> >> >>but
> >> >> >>I
> >> >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you
> >> >>have a
> >> >> >> window to work on it now.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is
> >>where
> >> >>it
> >> >> >> >will
> >> >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
> >> >> >>live...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >-Nick
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache.
> >>I’m
> >> >> >>ready
> >> >> >> >>to
> >> >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
> >> >> >>flex-utilities,
> >> >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
> >> >> >>trademark
> >> >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should
> >>change to
> >> >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
> >> >> >>originals. So
> >> >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >Vote passed with:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
> >> >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded
> >>so we
> >> >> >>can
> >> >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >-Alex
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>+1
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE
> >>thread,
> >> >>so
> >> >> >> >>here it
> >> >> >> >> >>>is:
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
> >> >>content
> >> >> >> >>found
> >> >> >> >> >>>here
> >> >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe
> >>stuff
> >> >>you
> >> >> >>see
> >> >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text
> >> >>content
> >> >> >> >>will
> >> >> >> >> >>>be
> >> >> >> >> >>> donated.
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe
> >> >>admins
> >> >> >> >>will
> >> >> >> >> >>>send
> >> >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and
> >>then
> >> >>we
> >> >> >>can
> >> >> >> >> >>>start
> >> >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> -Alex
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>>_
> >> >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
> >> >>Security.cloud
> >> >> >> >> >>>service.
> >> >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit
> >> http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>>_
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Unless there are a lot of them, it will probably take less time to replace
the data with local .xml files. Some of this stuff was created and
maintained by individuals and had no corporate backup.
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 2:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content
>from this server:
>http://aspexamples.adobe.com
>
>Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page:
>http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568
>f-7ffc.html
>
>The swf file loads, tries to load something from
>http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails
>silently.
>
>It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well. Although
>we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least
>able to reuse the content.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems
>>to
>> prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
>> (site/branches/flexdocs).
>>
>> After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a
>> folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html
>> files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are
>> examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are
>>the
>> right files yet or not.
>>
>> My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up
>>against
>> the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html
>>files
>> into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to
>>commit
>> the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we
>> were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this
>> folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only
>> for the ones I can prove match up.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>>
>> >You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
>> >
>> >-Nick
>> >
>> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only
>>trunk
>> >> gets pub’d?
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project
>>get
>> >>put
>> >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
>> >> >
>> >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
>> >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up
>>a
>> >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we
>> >>can
>> >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the
>> >>more
>> >> >complex it is to find stuff :)
>> >> >
>> >> >-Nick
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What
>> >>folder
>> >> >> should be put it in?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the
>> >>wording
>> >> >>of
>> >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his
>>concern,
>> >>but
>> >> >>I
>> >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you
>> >>have a
>> >> >> window to work on it now.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is
>>where
>> >>it
>> >> >> >will
>> >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
>> >> >>live...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >-Nick
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache.
>>I’m
>> >> >>ready
>> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
>> >> >>flex-utilities,
>> >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
>> >> >>trademark
>> >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should
>>change to
>> >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
>> >> >>originals. So
>> >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Vote passed with:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
>> >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded
>>so we
>> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >-Alex
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>+1
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE
>>thread,
>> >>so
>> >> >> >>here it
>> >> >> >> >>>is:
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
>> >>content
>> >> >> >>found
>> >> >> >> >>>here
>> >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe
>>stuff
>> >>you
>> >> >>see
>> >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text
>> >>content
>> >> >> >>will
>> >> >> >> >>>be
>> >> >> >> >>> donated.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe
>> >>admins
>> >> >> >>will
>> >> >> >> >>>send
>> >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and
>>then
>> >>we
>> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> >>>start
>> >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>>
>>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>_
>> >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>> >>Security.cloud
>> >> >> >> >>>service.
>> >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit
>> http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>>
>>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>_
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content
from this server:
http://aspexamples.adobe.com
Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568f-7ffc.html
The swf file loads, tries to load something from
http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails
silently.
It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well. Although
we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least
able to reuse the content.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems to
> prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
> (site/branches/flexdocs).
>
> After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a
> folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html
> files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are
> examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are the
> right files yet or not.
>
> My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up against
> the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html files
> into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to commit
> the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we
> were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this
> folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only
> for the ones I can prove match up.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>
> >You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
> >
> >-Nick
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> >> gets pub’d?
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get
> >>put
> >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
> >> >
> >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
> >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
> >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we
> >>can
> >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the
> >>more
> >> >complex it is to find stuff :)
> >> >
> >> >-Nick
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What
> >>folder
> >> >> should be put it in?
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the
> >>wording
> >> >>of
> >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern,
> >>but
> >> >>I
> >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you
> >>have a
> >> >> window to work on it now.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where
> >>it
> >> >> >will
> >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
> >> >>live...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-Nick
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m
> >> >>ready
> >> >> >>to
> >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
> >> >>flex-utilities,
> >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
> >> >>trademark
> >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
> >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
> >> >>originals. So
> >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Vote passed with:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
> >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we
> >> >>can
> >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >-Alex
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>+1
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread,
> >>so
> >> >> >>here it
> >> >> >> >>>is:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
> >>content
> >> >> >>found
> >> >> >> >>>here
> >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff
> >>you
> >> >>see
> >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text
> >>content
> >> >> >>will
> >> >> >> >>>be
> >> >> >> >>> donated.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe
> >>admins
> >> >> >>will
> >> >> >> >>>send
> >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then
> >>we
> >> >>can
> >> >> >> >>>start
> >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> -Alex
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>>>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
> >>Security.cloud
> >> >> >> >>>service.
> >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit
> http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>>>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems to
prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch
(site/branches/flexdocs).
After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a
folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html
files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are
examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are the
right files yet or not.
My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up against
the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html files
into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to commit
the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we
were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this
folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only
for the ones I can prove match up.
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
>
>-Nick
>
>On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
>> gets pub’d?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>>
>> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get
>>put
>> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
>> >
>> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
>> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
>> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we
>>can
>> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the
>>more
>> >complex it is to find stuff :)
>> >
>> >-Nick
>> >
>> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What
>>folder
>> >> should be put it in?
>> >>
>> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the
>>wording
>> >>of
>> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern,
>>but
>> >>I
>> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you
>>have a
>> >> window to work on it now.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where
>>it
>> >> >will
>> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
>> >>live...
>> >> >
>> >> >-Nick
>> >> >
>> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m
>> >>ready
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
>> >>flex-utilities,
>> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
>> >>trademark
>> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
>> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
>> >>originals. So
>> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Vote passed with:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
>> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we
>> >>can
>> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >-Alex
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>+1
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread,
>>so
>> >> >>here it
>> >> >> >>>is:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the
>>content
>> >> >>found
>> >> >> >>>here
>> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff
>>you
>> >>see
>> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text
>>content
>> >> >>will
>> >> >> >>>be
>> >> >> >>> donated.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe
>>admins
>> >> >>will
>> >> >> >>>send
>> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then
>>we
>> >>can
>> >> >> >>>start
>> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> -Alex
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >>
>>>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>>Security.cloud
>> >> >> >>>service.
>> >> >> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >> >> >>>
>> >>
>>>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
You are correct. That would be the best way to go.
-Nick
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
> gets pub’d?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>
> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get put
> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
> >
> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we can
> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the more
> >complex it is to find stuff :)
> >
> >-Nick
> >
> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What folder
> >> should be put it in?
> >>
> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the wording
> >>of
> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, but
> >>I
> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you have a
> >> window to work on it now.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it
> >> >will
> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
> >>live...
> >> >
> >> >-Nick
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m
> >>ready
> >> >>to
> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
> >>flex-utilities,
> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
> >>trademark
> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
> >>originals. So
> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Vote passed with:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes
> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
> >> >> >
> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we
> >>can
> >> >> >start on the IP clearance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-Alex
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>+1
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so
> >> >>here it
> >> >> >>>is:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content
> >> >>found
> >> >> >>>here
> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you
> >>see
> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content
> >> >>will
> >> >> >>>be
> >> >> >>> donated.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins
> >> >>will
> >> >> >>>send
> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we
> >>can
> >> >> >>>start
> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> -Alex
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >> >> >>>service.
> >> >> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only trunk
gets pub’d?
-Alex
On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get put
>on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
>
>I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
>published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
>ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we can
>actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the more
>complex it is to find stuff :)
>
>-Nick
>
>On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What folder
>> should be put it in?
>>
>> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the wording
>>of
>> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, but
>>I
>> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you have a
>> window to work on it now.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>>
>> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it
>> >will
>> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it
>>live...
>> >
>> >-Nick
>> >
>> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m
>>ready
>> >>to
>> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use
>>flex-utilities,
>> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>> >>
>> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other
>>trademark
>> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
>> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the
>>originals. So
>> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Vote passed with:
>> >> >
>> >> >11 +1 binding votes
>> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
>> >> >
>> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we
>>can
>> >> >start on the IP clearance.
>> >> >
>> >> >-Alex
>> >> >
>> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>+1
>> >> >>
>> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so
>> >>here it
>> >> >>>is:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content
>> >>found
>> >> >>>here
>> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you
>>see
>> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content
>> >>will
>> >> >>>be
>> >> >>> donated.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins
>> >>will
>> >> >>>send
>> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we
>>can
>> >> >>>start
>> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> -Alex
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> >> >>>service.
>> >> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >> >>>
>> >>______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project get put
on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday.
I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being
published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up a
ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we can
actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the more
complex it is to find stuff :)
-Nick
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What folder
> should be put it in?
>
> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the wording of
> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, but I
> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you have a
> window to work on it now.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>
> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it
> >will
> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it live...
> >
> >-Nick
> >
> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready
> >>to
> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use flex-utilities,
> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
> >>
> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other trademark
> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the originals. So
> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Vote passed with:
> >> >
> >> >11 +1 binding votes
> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
> >> >
> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
> >> >start on the IP clearance.
> >> >
> >> >-Alex
> >> >
> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>+1
> >> >>
> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so
> >>here it
> >> >>>is:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content
> >>found
> >> >>>here
> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content
> >>will
> >> >>>be
> >> >>> donated.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins
> >>will
> >> >>>send
> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we can
> >> >>>start
> >> >>> the IP Clearance process.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Here’s my +1.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -Alex
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >> >>>service.
> >> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> >>>
> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What folder
should be put it in?
BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the wording of
the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his concern, but I
guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you have a
window to work on it now.
-Alex
On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <ni...@spoon.as> wrote:
>I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it
>will
>end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it live...
>
>-Nick
>
>On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready
>>to
>> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use flex-utilities,
>> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>>
>> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other trademark
>> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
>> something else, which I will do right after committing the originals. So
>> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Vote passed with:
>> >
>> >11 +1 binding votes
>> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
>> >
>> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
>> >start on the IP clearance.
>> >
>> >-Alex
>> >
>> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>+1
>> >>
>> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so
>>here it
>> >>>is:
>> >>>
>> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content
>>found
>> >>>here
>> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
>> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content
>>will
>> >>>be
>> >>> donated.
>> >>>
>> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins
>>will
>> >>>send
>> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we can
>> >>>start
>> >>> the IP Clearance process.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here’s my +1.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> >>>service.
>> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is where it will
end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it live...
-Nick
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready to
> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use flex-utilities,
> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
>
> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other trademark
> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
> something else, which I will do right after committing the originals. So
> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >Vote passed with:
> >
> >11 +1 binding votes
> > 2 +1 non-binding votes
> >
> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
> >start on the IP clearance.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> >
> >>+1
> >>
> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it
> >>>is:
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found
> >>>here
> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content will
> >>>be
> >>> donated.
> >>>
> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins will
> >>>send
> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we can
> >>>start
> >>> the IP Clearance process.
> >>>
> >>> Here’s my +1.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >>>service.
> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >>> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Flex Doc Donation
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. I’m ready to
commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use flex-utilities,
but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN?
BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other trademark
names used in lists of products and fonts that we should change to
something else, which I will do right after committing the originals. So
the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site.
-Alex
On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Vote passed with:
>
>11 +1 binding votes
> 2 +1 non-binding votes
>
>After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded so we can
>start on the IP clearance.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote:
>>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE thread, so here it
>>>is:
>>>
>>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the content found
>>>here
>>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe stuff you see
>>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text content will
>>>be
>>> donated.
>>>
>>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe admins will
>>>send
>>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and then we can
>>>start
>>> the IP Clearance process.
>>>
>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>>service.
>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>
>