You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/30 09:02:06 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-8137) Sends the EC schema to DataNode as well in EC encoding/recovering command

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HDFS-8137:
--------------------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-8137-0.patch

I generated an initial patch for review!
We supposed to get schema values from ECSchemaManager, but right now I don't see a better way to get from ECScheaManeger, so I added an API to get from BlockCollection itself like isStriped API in it. It's because BlockManager communicates with namesystem via Namesystem interface. I don't think its right to add apis there for every new features. BlockCollection is another interface like that and I added there. But logically Namesystem may be correct place to add getECSchema for a file path . But I am not too strong on that. I would like hear the suggestion on that if any.

> Sends the EC schema to DataNode as well in EC encoding/recovering command
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8137
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Kai Zheng
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>         Attachments: HDFS-8137-0.patch
>
>
> Discussed with [~umamaheswararao] and [~vinayrpet], we should also send the EC schema to DataNode as well contained in the EC encoding/recovering command. The target DataNode will use it to guide the executing of the task. 
> Another way would be, DataNode would just request schema actively thru a separate RPC call, and as an optimization consideration, DataNode may cache schemas to avoid repeatedly asking for the same schema twice.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)