You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/03/03 00:47:12 UTC
[GitHub] [arrow] paleolimbot commented on a change in pull request #12533: ARROW-15817: [R] Use TableSourceNode instead of InMemoryDataset
paleolimbot commented on a change in pull request #12533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/12533#discussion_r818222944
##########
File path: r/src/recordbatchreader.cpp
##########
@@ -51,6 +51,20 @@ std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table> Table__from_RecordBatchReader(
return table;
}
+// [[arrow::export]]
+std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table> RecordBatchReader__Head(
+ const std::shared_ptr<arrow::RecordBatchReader>& reader, int64_t num_rows) {
+ std::vector<std::shared_ptr<arrow::RecordBatch>> batches;
+ std::shared_ptr<arrow::RecordBatch> this_batch;
+ while (num_rows > 0) {
+ this_batch = ValueOrStop(reader->Next());
+ if (this_batch == nullptr) break;
+ batches.push_back(this_batch->Slice(0, num_rows));
+ num_rows -= this_batch->num_rows();
+ }
+ return ValueOrStop(arrow::Table::FromRecordBatches(reader->schema(), batches));
+}
Review comment:
My reading of this is that it may give more rows than `num_rows`...is that the intention? I get that it's awkward because the record batch reader is mutable (as Jon noted below).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org