You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Apache Spark (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/11/19 01:36:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-37379) Add tree pattern pruning to CTESubstitution rule
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17446232#comment-17446232 ]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-37379:
--------------------------------------
User 'JoshRosen' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34658
> Add tree pattern pruning to CTESubstitution rule
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-37379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37379
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Optimizer
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Josh Rosen
> Assignee: Josh Rosen
> Priority: Major
>
> I propose to add tree pattern pruning to the CTESubstitution rule in order to skip tree traversal when the tree does not contain an UnresolvedWith expression.
> This is motivated by profiling a job which uses DataFrame APIs to incrementally construct a huge query plan (200k+ nodes): each API call results in eager re-analysis of the plan, of which CTESubstitution accounts for the majority of the analysis time. This query didn't contain CTEs, so skipping the CTESubstitution significantly speeds up analysis.
> I plan to submit a patch for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org