You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2003/12/29 18:24:55 UTC
Re: in-tree Berkeley DB (was: Re: .autogen.sh error for svn
revision 8113)
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 19:14, Garret Wilson wrote:
> However, when trying to configure Subversion:
>
> ./configure --with-libs=/usr/local/ssl --with-ssl
> --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 --with-apr-util=/usr/local/apache2
> --with-berkeley-db=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2
>
> I now get:
>
> [...]
> configure: Apache Portable Runtime (APR) library configuration
> checking for APR... yes
> checking APR version... 0.9.5
> configure: Apache Portable Runtime Utility (APRUTIL) library configuration
> checking for APR-util... yes
> checking APR-UTIL version... 0.9.5
> configure: error: Configuring against an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB is no
> longer supported. Berkeley DB must be separately
> installed,
> and perhaps specified by adding --with-berkeley-db=PATH
Hmmm. There is no db/ directory in your source tree?
> I've never used an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB, as far as I know, and as
> you can see I *am* using the --with-berkeley-db switch.
Ah, yes, and you shouldn't. You should only use this switch when
apr-util is in-tree. Maybe this isn't clear from the docs.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: in-tree Berkeley DB
Posted by Garret Wilson <ga...@globalmentor.com>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 19:45, Garret Wilson wrote:
>>In fact, during my tribulations yesterday, I downloaded the 0.35.1
>>tarball. During ./configure, it notified me that Berkeley DB was not
>>included, but if I wanted it included I should copy it to a db/
>>directory in the tree. As in-tree Berkeley DB is no longer supported,
>>these instruction messages should probably be changed.
>
> I've checked to see if those instructions were still there and to my
> knowledge there are none. If you are sure there are, please point
> them out so they can be removed.
Ahh, you're right. In my spiral to insanity yesterday, I compiled about
five different tarball versions. One of them *did* tell me to use db/,
but after checking I realize that it was not 0.35.1. It was likely a
tarball of a version before in-tree Berkeley-DB was banned.
Garret
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: in-tree Berkeley DB
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 19:45, Garret Wilson wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 19:14, Garret Wilson wrote:
> >>configure: error: Configuring against an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB is no
> >> longer supported. Berkeley DB must be separately
> >>installed,
> >> and perhaps specified by adding --with-berkeley-db=PATH
> >
> >
> > Hmmm. There is no db/ directory in your source tree?
> >
> >>I've never used an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB, as far as I know...
>
> You know, now that I think about it, I think that *I'm* the one who
> added the db/ directory---probably following the instructions of the
> bootstrap tarball I originally started with months ago.
>
> In fact, during my tribulations yesterday, I downloaded the 0.35.1
> tarball. During ./configure, it notified me that Berkeley DB was not
> included, but if I wanted it included I should copy it to a db/
> directory in the tree. As in-tree Berkeley DB is no longer supported,
> these instruction messages should probably be changed.
I've checked to see if those instructions were still there and to my
knowledge there are none. If you are sure there are, please point
them out so they can be removed.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: in-tree Berkeley DB
Posted by Garret Wilson <ga...@globalmentor.com>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 19:14, Garret Wilson wrote:
>>configure: error: Configuring against an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB is no
>> longer supported. Berkeley DB must be separately
>>installed,
>> and perhaps specified by adding --with-berkeley-db=PATH
>
>
> Hmmm. There is no db/ directory in your source tree?
>
>>I've never used an in-tree copy of Berkeley DB, as far as I know...
You know, now that I think about it, I think that *I'm* the one who
added the db/ directory---probably following the instructions of the
bootstrap tarball I originally started with months ago.
In fact, during my tribulations yesterday, I downloaded the 0.35.1
tarball. During ./configure, it notified me that Berkeley DB was not
included, but if I wanted it included I should copy it to a db/
directory in the tree. As in-tree Berkeley DB is no longer supported,
these instruction messages should probably be changed.
Cheers,
Garret
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org