You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Chip Cuccio <ch...@norlug.org> on 2004/06/29 05:43:11 UTC
2.0.50 RPM Specfile testing - was: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing
* Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:45:19AM +0200:
>
> The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
> run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
> then tar up the archive and run and an RPM should result.
Got it. Thanks...
> Right now if you try to build an rpm, it complains about unpackaged files.
Indeed it did. Applied diff, and am building on arbitrary RH 7.3 and 9.0
rpm buildhosts as I type this. Shall I send the resulting build-logs to the
list, or just you? I usually ask permission to send attachments to a list.
Thanks.
--
Chip Cuccio | <ch...@norlug.org>
NORLUG SysAdmin & Webmaster | <http://norlug.org/~chipster/>
Northfield Linux Users' Group | Northfield, Minnesota USA
Re: 2.0.50 RPM Specfile testing - was: 2.0.50 tarballs available for testing
Posted by Chip Cuccio <ch...@norlug.org>.
* Chip Cuccio <ch...@norlug.org>
|__ Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:43:11PM -0500:
>
> Indeed it did. Applied diff, and am building on arbitrary RH 7.3 and 9.0
> rpm buildhosts as I type this. Shall I send the resulting build-logs to the
> list, or just you? I usually ask permission to send attachments to a list.
Diff worked like a charm. Built RPMs successfully on;
- Red Hat 7.3, 9.0
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0
- Fedora Core 2
I have a bz2ball with the build-logs. Ping me if you would like them.
Thanks...
--
Chip Cuccio | <ch...@norlug.org>
NORLUG SysAdmin & Webmaster | <http://norlug.org/~chipster/>
Northfield Linux Users' Group | Northfield, Minnesota USA