You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by "Qian Xu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/20 07:30:34 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SQOOP-1768) Sqoop2: Simplify the command support for using the entity ids in the show command

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14218930#comment-14218930 ] 

Qian Xu edited comment on SQOOP-1768 at 11/20/14 6:30 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------

I've some thoughts:
1. Better use HTTP 301 to indicate REST API deprecation rather than removing them directly.
2. Besides short switches, better keep long switches as well. I'd only correct inconsistent usage of long/short switches in documentation.
3. {{\-\-all}} shows items in details. Without {{\-\-all}} shows items in a table. They are different.


was (Author: stanleyxu2005):
I've some thoughts:
1. Better use HTTP 301 to indicate REST API deprecation rather than removing them directly.
2. Besides short switches, better keep long switches as well. I'd only correct inconsistent usage of long/short switches in documentation.
3. {{--all}} shows items in details. Without {{--all}} shows items in a table. They are different.

> Sqoop2: Simplify the command support for using the entity ids in the show command
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1768
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Qian Xu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie++
>             Fix For: 1.99.5
>
>
> Since all is deprecated in the rest apis, the command line should get rid of the same as well.
> - show links should replace show link with no id today.
> - remove the support for -all
> - remove the confusion around 2 ways to give a entity Id,  Do we need --jid and -j ?
> Lets keep it simple
> -c for connector
> -l for link
> -j for job
> -s for status
> -f and -t  are basically the linkIds. so we should make it explicit that they are so



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)