You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2013/08/29 00:57:04 UTC
Any objections to committing cmake builds for Windows to the stable branches?
With something easily visible like README.cmake containing appropriate
disclaimers?*
I suspect that build bugs are likely to be found more quickly with the
stable branches just because it fits into more applications and/or
workflows (i.e., more people).
*i.e., probably has bugs in the build, has known limitations (see list),
build interface may change in a future stable release (until it is no
longer experimental), etc.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: Any objections to committing cmake builds for Windows to the
stable branches?
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With something easily visible like README.cmake containing appropriate
> disclaimers?*
>
> I suspect that build bugs are likely to be found more quickly with the
> stable branches just because it fits into more applications and/or workflows
> (i.e., more people).
no objection here
Re: Any objections to committing cmake builds for Windows to the stable branches?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
+1
On Aug 28, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With something easily visible like README.cmake containing appropriate disclaimers?*
>
> I suspect that build bugs are likely to be found more quickly with the stable branches just because it fits into more applications and/or workflows (i.e., more people).
>
> *i.e., probably has bugs in the build, has known limitations (see list), build interface may change in a future stable release (until it is no longer experimental), etc.
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> http://emptyhammock.com/