You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/15 20:12:35 UTC
Re: Building mahout
-user +dev
I haven't tried mvn 3.0 yet, is it something we want to support in 0.4?
On Oct 15, 2010 10:20 AM, "Jeff Eastman" <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> I'm also seeing these warnings with Maven 3.0 with the latest trunk,
> also some missing 'reporting.plugins.version' for
> maven-surfire-report-plugin, maven-checkstyle-plugin,
> maven-javadoc-plugin, maven-pmd-plugin; finally
> 'repositories.repository.layout' for java.net.legacy uses unsupported
> value 'legacy', artifact resolution might fail.
> @org.apache.mahout:mahout:-.4-SNAPSHOT.
> /home/dev/workspace/mahout/pom.xml, line 127, column 21.
>
> Again, Tim's patch fixed the compile error.
>
> On 10/15/10 12:38 AM, deneche abdelhakim wrote:
>> I was using maven 2.2.1 and the build was successful (I had other issues
though). But when I installed maven 3.0 I got a lot of warnings like this
one:
>>
>> Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for
org.apache.mahout:mahout-math:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT
>> [WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.(groupId:artifactId)' must be unique but
found duplicate declaration of plugin
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin @
org.apache.mahout:mahout:0.4-SNAPSHOT, /home/hakim/mahout-last/pom.xml, line
405, column 21
>>
>> and the build failed with the following error:
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.0:process (default)
on project mahout: Error loading supplemental data models: Could not find
resource 'supplemental-models.xml'.
>>
>> Making the change suggested by Tim fixes the problem of the build,
although I'm still getting the warnings.
>>
>> --- En date de : Jeu 14.10.10, Tim Liu<ti...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> De: Tim Liu<ti...@gmail.com>
>> Objet: Re: Building mahout
>> Ą: user@mahout.apache.org
>> Date: Jeudi 14 octobre 2010, 21h10
>>
>> The problem is gone after I modify top level's pom.xml (Line # 396) to
have
>> right path for the file supplemental-models.xml.
>>
>> I am wondering how it works w/o modification.
>>
>> new
>> ===
>> <appendedResourcesDirectory>*.*
>> /src/main/appended-resources</appendedResourcesDirectory>
>>
>> old
>> ==
>> <appendedResourcesDirectory>*..*
>> /src/main/appended-resources</appendedResourcesDirectory>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Jeff Eastman<jdog@windwardsolutions.com
>wrote:
>>
>>> I just did a clean checkout on my Mac and it built without issue. I'm
>>> going to look for a file system permission issue on the other box where
>>> building from the command line fails with the same symptoms as reported
in
>>> this issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/13/10 9:45 PM, Chris Schilling wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, I see the same thing (eclipse helios, m2eclipse plugin). Ive been
>>>> building from the command line and importing the "maven" project into
>>>> eclipse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:38 PM, gabeweb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If it helps, I get this problem with the trunk when building from
within
>>>>> Eclipse 1.5 using the m2 plugin on OS X 10.6, but not when building
from
>>>>> the
>>>>> command line. So I'm currently just building from the command line :)
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Building-mahout-tp1697626p1698594.html
>>>>> Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Our general process is that contributors who are not committers (i.e. you)
should attach a patch to a JIRA ticket.
Then committers and others should review the patch and a committer should
commit it when there is consensus that it is ready.
Ready generally means that the code looks clean, fixes a problem or extends
capability and has good test coverage. Style issues aren't a big deal for
you to worry about because somebody can revise your patch to match Mahout
style. It is nice if that isn't necessary, but it
takes a bit of practice to get all the details of that straight.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In addition to normal engineering procedures of code checkin, does mahout
> have other instructions?
>
> I'd like to know them before I start to commit code.
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
Jeff:
thank you for commit.
In addition to normal engineering procedures of code checkin, does mahout
have other instructions?
I'd like to know them before I start to commit code.
thanks
Tim
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Um, your patch. I thought it had been committed but I see now it was not. I
> will do later this evening unless someone beats me to it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Liu [mailto:tim.gangliu@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:21 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Building mahout
>
> how do you fix?
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 Even with 3.0 is seems to build ok
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Drew Farris [mailto:drew.farris@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 2:26 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Building mahout
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with
> > 3.0
> > > in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
> >
>
RE: Building mahout
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
Um, your patch. I thought it had been committed but I see now it was not. I will do later this evening unless someone beats me to it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Liu [mailto:tim.gangliu@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:21 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building mahout
how do you fix?
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> +1 Even with 3.0 is seems to build ok
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew Farris [mailto:drew.farris@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 2:26 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Building mahout
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with
> 3.0
> > in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
how do you fix?
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> +1 Even with 3.0 is seems to build ok
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew Farris [mailto:drew.farris@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 2:26 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Building mahout
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with
> 3.0
> > in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
>
RE: Building mahout
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
+1 Even with 3.0 is seems to build ok
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Farris [mailto:drew.farris@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 2:26 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building mahout
+1
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with 3.0
> in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with 3.0
> in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
where do you add? thanks
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> +1
>
> On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> > At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with
> 3.0
> > in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Since mvn 3.0 is NOT fully tested yet, may we update it on documentation
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout? Here
> is
> >> what there now:
> >>
> >>
> >> - Maven *2.0.9* or higher (http://maven.apache.org/)
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1
On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with 3.0
> in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since mvn 3.0 is NOT fully tested yet, may we update it on documentation
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout? Here is
>> what there now:
>>
>>
>> - Maven *2.0.9* or higher (http://maven.apache.org/)
>>
>>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
+1 definitely.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with 3.0
> in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Since mvn 3.0 is NOT fully tested yet, may we update it on documentation
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout? Here
> is
> > what there now:
> >
> >
> > - Maven *2.0.9* or higher (http://maven.apache.org/)
> >
> >
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
At this point I think we should just say note there may be issues with 3.0
in the wiki and not worry about it in the next few days for 0.4.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since mvn 3.0 is NOT fully tested yet, may we update it on documentation
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout? Here is
> what there now:
>
>
> - Maven *2.0.9* or higher (http://maven.apache.org/)
>
>
Re: Building mahout
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
Since mvn 3.0 is NOT fully tested yet, may we update it on documentation
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout? Here is
what there now:
- Maven *2.0.9* or higher (http://maven.apache.org/)
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -user +dev
>
> I haven't tried mvn 3.0 yet, is it something we want to support in 0.4?
> On Oct 15, 2010 10:20 AM, "Jeff Eastman" <jd...@windwardsolutions.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm also seeing these warnings with Maven 3.0 with the latest trunk,
> > also some missing 'reporting.plugins.version' for
> > maven-surfire-report-plugin, maven-checkstyle-plugin,
> > maven-javadoc-plugin, maven-pmd-plugin; finally
> > 'repositories.repository.layout' for java.net.legacy uses unsupported
> > value 'legacy', artifact resolution might fail.
> > @org.apache.mahout:mahout:-.4-SNAPSHOT.
> > /home/dev/workspace/mahout/pom.xml, line 127, column 21.
> >
> > Again, Tim's patch fixed the compile error.
> >
> > On 10/15/10 12:38 AM, deneche abdelhakim wrote:
> >> I was using maven 2.2.1 and the build was successful (I had other issues
> though). But when I installed maven 3.0 I got a lot of warnings like this
> one:
> >>
> >> Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for
> org.apache.mahout:mahout-math:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT
> >> [WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.(groupId:artifactId)' must be unique but
> found duplicate declaration of plugin
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin @
> org.apache.mahout:mahout:0.4-SNAPSHOT, /home/hakim/mahout-last/pom.xml,
> line
> 405, column 21
> >>
> >> and the build failed with the following error:
> >>
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.0:process
> (default)
> on project mahout: Error loading supplemental data models: Could not find
> resource 'supplemental-models.xml'.
> >>
> >> Making the change suggested by Tim fixes the problem of the build,
> although I'm still getting the warnings.
> >>
> >> --- En date de : Jeu 14.10.10, Tim Liu<ti...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >> De: Tim Liu<ti...@gmail.com>
> >> Objet: Re: Building mahout
> >> Ą: user@mahout.apache.org
> >> Date: Jeudi 14 octobre 2010, 21h10
> >>
> >> The problem is gone after I modify top level's pom.xml (Line # 396) to
> have
> >> right path for the file supplemental-models.xml.
> >>
> >> I am wondering how it works w/o modification.
> >>
> >> new
> >> ===
> >> <appendedResourcesDirectory>*.*
> >> /src/main/appended-resources</appendedResourcesDirectory>
> >>
> >> old
> >> ==
> >> <appendedResourcesDirectory>*..*
> >> /src/main/appended-resources</appendedResourcesDirectory>
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Jeff Eastman<
> jdog@windwardsolutions.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just did a clean checkout on my Mac and it built without issue. I'm
> >>> going to look for a file system permission issue on the other box where
> >>> building from the command line fails with the same symptoms as reported
> in
> >>> this issue.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/13/10 9:45 PM, Chris Schilling wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yeah, I see the same thing (eclipse helios, m2eclipse plugin). Ive
> been
> >>>> building from the command line and importing the "maven" project into
> >>>> eclipse.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:38 PM, gabeweb wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> If it helps, I get this problem with the trunk when building from
> within
> >>>>> Eclipse 1.5 using the m2 plugin on OS X 10.6, but not when building
> from
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> command line. So I'm currently just building from the command line :)
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Building-mahout-tp1697626p1698594.html
> >>>>> Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>