You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@taverna.apache.org by Christian Brenninkmeijer <ch...@manchester.ac.uk> on 2015/03/12 11:18:29 UTC
Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Hi All,
Do we have Apache Taverna accounts for:
Twitter
YouTube
Googleplus
Facebook
SlideShare
Google Calendar
ect?
If not what are the Apache standards for setting these up.
Thinks like,
What name to use? Should the name include "Incubator"?
Who should have admin password ect?
What to put on each and what not
Christian
Re: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 19/03/2015 09:49, Christian Brenninkmeijer wrote:
> I have setup
> https://twitter.com/ApacheTaverna
> with the private@ email address (awaiting a mod to click on the confirm link)
>
> Please contact me for the password.
I have confirmed the Twitter account and my LastPass now knows the
password :-)
> Christian
Alan
RE: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Posted by Christian Brenninkmeijer <ch...@manchester.ac.uk>.
I have setup
https://twitter.com/ApacheTaverna
with the private@ email address (awaiting a mod to click on the confirm link)
Please contact me for the password.
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 3:22 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Go ahead with Facebook if you feel like it - I just don't think it's
relevant given what Facebook is used for.. should we be on Instagram
and Snapchat as well? :-)
On 16 March 2015 at 10:50, alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 18:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>
>> It was encouraged at the ApacheCon Marketing talk to create such accounts,
>> for nothing else but to claim the names.
>
>
> [snip]
>
>> From your list I am not sure about Facebook or Google Calendar, but the
>> rest look very relevant. Views?
>
>
> I agree on Google calendar. What is your objection to Facebook?
>
> Alan
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Go ahead with Facebook if you feel like it - I just don't think it's
relevant given what Facebook is used for.. should we be on Instagram
and Snapchat as well? :-)
On 16 March 2015 at 10:50, alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 18:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>
>> It was encouraged at the ApacheCon Marketing talk to create such accounts,
>> for nothing else but to claim the names.
>
>
> [snip]
>
>> From your list I am not sure about Facebook or Google Calendar, but the
>> rest look very relevant. Views?
>
>
> I agree on Google calendar. What is your objection to Facebook?
>
> Alan
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 12/03/2015 18:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> It was encouraged at the ApacheCon Marketing talk to create such accounts,
> for nothing else but to claim the names.
[snip]
> From your list I am not sure about Facebook or Google Calendar, but the
> rest look very relevant. Views?
I agree on Google calendar. What is your objection to Facebook?
Alan
Re: Taverna Twitter/ Youtube/ GooglePlus/ Facebook ect
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
It was encouraged at the ApacheCon Marketing talk to create such accounts,
for nothing else but to claim the names.
I don't think we need to have (incubating) in the usernames, but in the
profile names, yes!
Username should be like @ApacheTaverna I would guess - that's the style I
see searching for "Apache" users on Twitter.
Perhaps the simplest is if a committer creates it with a long enough
randomly generated password, and sends password to private@ - then the PPMC
will have access and will have to treat it like updating the website, e.g.
officially representing the project.
If in doubt on what to respond to someone contacting us on one of those
accounts, I would say reply with personal account (if it is public like on
Twitter) or forward to private (if a question came in through a direct
message). At the appropriate time, try to direct the contacting party to
use the mailing lists.
As a neutral Apache project we can't be seen to endorse third-party
products/projects/research, but that should not mean we can't retweet "good
stories about Taverna".
>From your list I am not sure about Facebook or Google Calendar, but the
rest look very relevant. Views?
We should link to the accounts from /community/ on the website.
On 12 Mar 2015 10:19, "Christian Brenninkmeijer" <
christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Do we have Apache Taverna accounts for:
>
> Twitter
> YouTube
> Googleplus
> Facebook
> SlideShare
> Google Calendar
> ect?
>
> If not what are the Apache standards for setting these up.
> Thinks like,
> What name to use? Should the name include "Incubator"?
> Who should have admin password ect?
> What to put on each and what not
>
> Christian
>
>
>