You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Ashwin Karpe (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/04/28 14:03:03 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-3910) Add "Sticky Failover" support in
the camel load balancer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13026268#comment-13026268 ]
Ashwin Karpe commented on CAMEL-3910:
-------------------------------------
Looks like this need not be necessarily tied to the load balancer (since it is not a load balancing need) but be available as independent failover support.
This need could be addressed in many ways including policy sets on a route.
The best way to meet this need requires some thought and input...
- Ashwin,..
> Add "Sticky Failover" support in the camel load balancer
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-3910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3910
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Ashwin Karpe
>
> Essentially, given a list of endpoints (endpoint1, endpoint2), the failoverpolicy should initially send all messages to endpoint1. In a failover scenario, the route should send messages to endpoint2 instead of endpoint1, and continue to do so until endpoint2 fails. If endpoint2 were then to fail, messages start being sent to endpoint1 again.
> The current support for sticky load balancing and failover load balancing do not address the need for sticky failover.
> Sticky Load Balancing requires the user to set a header and is not meant for failover scenarios, whereas failover load balancing is not sticky.
> Please check out the following Nabble link for more details
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Sticky-failover-load-balancing-td4346193.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira