You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2008/04/01 19:07:33 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
On Mar 31, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:27 PM, David Jencks
> <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> First, and this is a blocker, there are no hardcoded LICENSE and
> NOTICE files in svn at the checkout root.
>
> I looked at the Dev site at Apache (http://apache.org/dev/) and
> could not find the place where it is explicitely said that LICENSE
> and NOTICE files are required in SVN at the checkout root. Even
> though, I'm not against adding them in here. ;)
> I'm just curious of any legal document I'm not aware of. Could you
> point me to that page please ?
As (in my experience) most process bits of ASF stuff any docs you may
find are generally wrong and if you ask any collection of old-timers
you get a different answer from each. However there's been a lot of
discussion on legal-discuss recently and after a lot of prodding
there seems to be consensus that:
- all distribution units need LICENSE and NOTICE files
- expected svn checkout units form a "distribution" so need to
include LICENSE and NOTICE files
- all other LICENSE and NOTICE files can be generated or from svn
- each LICENSE and NOTICE file refers only to the contents of the
distribution unit, not anything such as required dependencies that
might be needed to use it.
>
>
> Where should we have these files?
> At /directory/studio? Or both at /directory/studio/trunk and /
> directory/studio/branches/1.1.0?
.../trunk and ..../branches/1.1.0 since those are what we expect
people to check out if they want to build it themselves.
>
> Thanks.
>
> As I explained in my previous mails, this vote was about the 1.1.0
> branch (/directory/studio/branches/1.1
> .0) and we should have been more explicit. Is your vote still -1
> for this branch ?
I haven't had time to look at this branch. Is it built with maven?
I'm not sure if I'll have time to look soon. If you guys are
confident that all the artifacts have appropriate legal files and
there are no snapshots in any maven build (if used) I'm happy to
change to +0.
thanks
david jencks
>
>
> I'm going to add DIRSTUDIO-313 (Copyright in Splash Screen and Help
> Dialog is still 2007) to the 1.1.0 roadmap. It's an easy fix and as
> it deals with copyright I think it's important to fix it right now.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
Re: [VOTE] [Results] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi,
I just deployed the different packages for the standalone application and
the jars for the updatesite (plugins and features).
Now, we have to wait for the replication.
I'll update the download links on the website and the site.xml file for the
update site as soon as the replication is done.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>
wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > @Pierre-Arnaud:
> > Could you please manage the release, you are much more familiar with the
> > process and I can't find enought time these days. Many thanks.
> >
>
> No problem. I'll do this tomorrow morning.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
Re: [VOTE] [Results] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>
wrote:
> @Pierre-Arnaud:
> Could you please manage the release, you are much more familiar with the
> process and I can't find enought time these days. Many thanks.
>
No problem. I'll do this tomorrow morning.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
[VOTE] [Results] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>.
Hi
Here are the results for the vote.
Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0:
* 6 +1 votes
o Emmanuel Lécharny
o Alex Karasulu
o Ersin Er
o Stefan Zoerner
o Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
o Felix Knecht (non-binding)
* No +/-0 vote
* One -1 vote
o David Jencks (non-binding)
Lets go to release the packages and update the website, online
documentation and update site.
@Pierre-Arnaud:
Could you please manage the release, you are much more familiar with the
process and I can't find enought time these days. Many thanks.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Seelmann
Alex Karasulu schrieb:
> Close the vote you have had enough binding votes. Also the issues that
> David raised have been fixed. Just close the vote. It's a success.
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net
> <ma...@marcelot.net>> wrote:
>
> Is the person who started the vote the only who can close it?
> Or, for example, can I close it (and launch another one)?
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> <elecharny@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> This vote has been open for a little while now.
>
> What should we do about it?
>
> What about closing it and reopening a new one ?
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
>
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com>
> directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Close the vote you have had enough binding votes. Also the issues that
David raised have been fixed. Just close the vote. It's a success.
Alex
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>
wrote:
> Is the person who started the vote the only who can close it?
> Or, for example, can I close it (and launch another one)?
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > This vote has been open for a little while now.
> > >
> > > What should we do about it?
> > >
> > What about closing it and reopening a new one ?
> >
> > --
> > --
> > cordialement, regards,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> > directory.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Is the person who started the vote the only who can close it?
Or, for example, can I close it (and launch another one)?
Thanks,
Pierre-Arnaud
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > This vote has been open for a little while now.
> >
> > What should we do about it?
> >
> What about closing it and reopening a new one ?
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This vote has been open for a little while now.
>
> What should we do about it?
What about closing it and reopening a new one ?
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org>.
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb:
> Guys,
>
> This vote has been open for a little while now.
>
> What should we do about it?
- Count the votes from PMC members and make a decision the release or not ? ;-)
- Open the next vote with
"This majority vote stays open for 72 hours."
then your sure when the vote is over.
Maybe it's an idea ;-)
Felix
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Guys,
This vote has been open for a little while now.
What should we do about it?
Thanks,
Pierre-Arnaud
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > As (in my experience) most process bits of ASF stuff any docs you may
> > find are generally wrong and if you ask any collection of old-timers you get
> > a different answer from each. However there's been a lot of discussion on
> > legal-discuss recently and after a lot of prodding there seems to be
> > consensus that:
> > - all distribution units need LICENSE and NOTICE files
> > - expected svn checkout units form a "distribution" so need to include
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files
> > - all other LICENSE and NOTICE files can be generated or from svn
> > - each LICENSE and NOTICE file refers only to the contents of the
> > distribution unit, not anything such as required dependencies that might be
> > needed to use it.
> >
>
> Thanks.
> We comply with all these rules except for the inclusion of the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files at the SVN checkout root.
> I'm going to add them.
>
>
>
> > .../trunk and ..../branches/1.1.0 since those are what we expect people
> > to check out if they want to build it themselves.
> >
>
> Ok, I'm going to add them in both locations.
>
>
> I haven't had time to look at this branch. Is it built with maven? I'm
> > not sure if I'll have time to look soon. If you guys are confident that all
> > the artifacts have appropriate legal files and there are no snapshots in any
> > maven build (if used) I'm happy to change to +0.
> >
>
> Yeah, It is built with Maven. Here are the instructions to build Studio:
> http://directory.apache.org/studio/building.html
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Hi David,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As (in my experience) most process bits of ASF stuff any docs you may find
> are generally wrong and if you ask any collection of old-timers you get a
> different answer from each. However there's been a lot of discussion on
> legal-discuss recently and after a lot of prodding there seems to be
> consensus that:
> - all distribution units need LICENSE and NOTICE files
> - expected svn checkout units form a "distribution" so need to include
> LICENSE and NOTICE files
> - all other LICENSE and NOTICE files can be generated or from svn
> - each LICENSE and NOTICE file refers only to the contents of the
> distribution unit, not anything such as required dependencies that might be
> needed to use it.
>
Thanks.
We comply with all these rules except for the inclusion of the LICENSE and
NOTICE files at the SVN checkout root.
I'm going to add them.
> .../trunk and ..../branches/1.1.0 since those are what we expect people to
> check out if they want to build it themselves.
>
Ok, I'm going to add them in both locations.
I haven't had time to look at this branch. Is it built with maven? I'm not
> sure if I'll have time to look soon. If you guys are confident that all the
> artifacts have appropriate legal files and there are no snapshots in any
> maven build (if used) I'm happy to change to +0.
>
Yeah, It is built with Maven. Here are the instructions to build Studio:
http://directory.apache.org/studio/building.html
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud